Diminishing Partisanship
US Congress Rallies Around the Flag on China Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6445378 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Linggong Kong (0009-0000-4670-9267, Auburn University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1555-5623 • E-ISSN: 1747-1346 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/polp.70082 |
| OpenAlex | W4415130858 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
This study examines the evolving dynamics of partisan polarization in US congressional behavior toward China. While Republicans have traditionally adopted more hawkish stances and Democrats have favored engagement, recent years—particularly since 2018—have witnessed the emergence of a bipartisan consensus framing China as a strategic threat. Drawing on an original dataset of 138 China‐specific congressional roll‐call votes from 1989 to 2024, the study employs two empirical indicators—a Party Difference Score and a Partisan Hawkishness Score—to assess ideological divergence and policy alignment across five issue domains. Standardized OLS regression and difference‐in‐means analyses reveal a significant decline in partisan differences on national security–related legislation, accompanied by a notable rise in hawkishness among both parties. However, polarization remains pronounced on issues related to trade, cultural exchange, and multifaceted policy areas. These findings lend support to both the external threat hypothesis and the literature on partisan foreign policy polarization: while perceptions of existential threat can foster bipartisan alignment in national security, they do not fully override entrenched ideological divisions across broader foreign policy domains. Related Articles Fowler, L. 2022 “Searching for Green Elephants and Other Mythical Creatures during the Trump Years: Partisanship and Congressional Voting on Environmental Legislation.” Politics and Policy 50, no. 5: 913–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12499 . Dunning, K. H. 2021. “Unlikely Conservation Policy Making in a Polarized Congress: A Multiple Streams Analysis of ‘America's Most Successful Conservation Program’.” Politics and Policy 50, no. 1: 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12448 . Gershtenson, J., Smith, B.W., and Mangun, W. R. 2006. “Friends of the Earth? Partisanship, Party Control of Congress, and Environmental Legislation in Congress.” Politics and Policy 34, no. 1: 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2006.00004.x
International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
The Politics of American Foreign Policy
Sailing the Water's Edge
The Functions of Social Conflict
Can China rise peacefully?
A House Divided? Roll Calls, Polarization, and Policy Differences in the U.S. House, 1877–2011
China's Unpeaceful Rise
Forcing the President's Hand
The US Congress and Rogue States
The prevalence of bipartisanship in U.S. foreign policy
Partisanship in Congressional Travels abroad
Brakeman or booster? Presidents, ideological polarization, reciprocity, and the politics of US arms control
Polarized we trade? Intraparty polarization and US trade policy
Foreign policy free agents
Are we drowning at the water’s edge? Foreign policy polarization among the US Public
Polarization, casualty sensitivity, and military operations
Foreign policy, bipartisanship and the paradox of post-September 11 America
Finding the water’s edge
Perils of Polarization for U.S. Foreign Policy
Sectional Biases in Congress on Foreign Policy
"Meeting the Communist Threat" Truman to Reagan
The Instruments of American Foreign Policy
Ideological Polarization and the Vanishing of Marginals
Unanswered threats
Free Hand Abroad, Divide and Rule at Home
Do Partisan Types Stop at the Water’s Edge
Negative Partisanship
Party Polarization in the US Congress
Ideological structure and foreign policy preferences
The Return to Personalistic Rule
Theory, Policy, and Resource Cartels
Politics at the Water's Edge
Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate
The Nature of Affective Polarization
Division at the Water’s Edge
Political Orientation, Party Affiliation, and American Attitudes Towards China
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
The Erosion of American National Interests
The New Apathy
The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data
Economic Instability and Military Strength
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |