Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Diminishing Partisanship

US Congress Rallies Around the Flag on China Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID6445378
AuthorsLinggong Kong (0009-0000-4670-9267, Auburn University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume53
Issue5
Publication date2025-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1555-5623 • E-ISSN: 1747-1346
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/polp.70082
OpenAlexW4415130858
LanguageEN
References cited53

This study examines the evolving dynamics of partisan polarization in US congressional behavior toward China. While Republicans have traditionally adopted more hawkish stances and Democrats have favored engagement, recent years—particularly since 2018—have witnessed the emergence of a bipartisan consensus framing China as a strategic threat. Drawing on an original dataset of 138 China‐specific congressional roll‐call votes from 1989 to 2024, the study employs two empirical indicators—a Party Difference Score and a Partisan Hawkishness Score—to assess ideological divergence and policy alignment across five issue domains. Standardized OLS regression and difference‐in‐means analyses reveal a significant decline in partisan differences on national security–related legislation, accompanied by a notable rise in hawkishness among both parties. However, polarization remains pronounced on issues related to trade, cultural exchange, and multifaceted policy areas. These findings lend support to both the external threat hypothesis and the literature on partisan foreign policy polarization: while perceptions of existential threat can foster bipartisan alignment in national security, they do not fully override entrenched ideological divisions across broader foreign policy domains. Related Articles Fowler, L. 2022 “Searching for Green Elephants and Other Mythical Creatures during the Trump Years: Partisanship and Congressional Voting on Environmental Legislation.” Politics and Policy 50, no. 5: 913–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12499 . Dunning, K. H. 2021. “Unlikely Conservation Policy Making in a Polarized Congress: A Multiple Streams Analysis of ‘America's Most Successful Conservation Program’.” Politics and Policy 50, no. 1: 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12448 . Gershtenson, J., Smith, B.W., and Mangun, W. R. 2006. “Friends of the Earth? Partisanship, Party Control of Congress, and Environmental Legislation in Congress.” Politics and Policy 34, no. 1: 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2006.00004.x

International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

  • The Politics of American Foreign Policy

    Peter Gries, Peter Hays Gries•Politics of American Foreign Policy•2014

  • Sailing the Water's Edge

    Helen V Milner, Dustin Tingley•Sailing the Water's Edge•2015

  • The Functions of Social Conflict

    Lewis A Coser•The Functions of Social Conflict•1956

  • Can China rise peacefully?

    Jude Woodward•US vs China•2017

  • A House Divided? Roll Calls, Polarization, and Policy Differences in the U.S. House, 1877–2011

    Open Access•David A Bateman, Joshua D Clinton et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • China's Unpeaceful Rise

    John J Mearsheimer•Current History•2006

  • Forcing the President's Hand

    Open Access•Jordan Tama•Foreign Policy Analysis•2019

  • The US Congress and Rogue States

    Open Access•Shereen Kotb, Gyung-Ho Jeong•Foreign Policy Analysis•2021

  • The prevalence of bipartisanship in U.S. foreign policy

    Open Access•James D Bryan, Jordan Tama•International Politics•2021

  • Partisanship in Congressional Travels abroad

    Open Access•Zachary A Mcgee, Sean M Theriault•International Politics•2022

  • Brakeman or booster? Presidents, ideological polarization, reciprocity, and the politics of US arms control

    Open Access•Florian Böller•International Politics•2021

  • Polarized we trade? Intraparty polarization and US trade policy

    Open Access•Gordon M Friedrichs•International Politics•2021

  • Foreign policy free agents

    Open Access•Patrick Homan, Jeffrey S Lantis•International Politics•2022

  • Are we drowning at the water’s edge? Foreign policy polarization among the US Public

    Open Access•Dina Smeltz•International Politics•2022

  • Polarization, casualty sensitivity, and military operations

    Open Access•Carrie A Lee•International Politics•2022

  • Foreign policy, bipartisanship and the paradox of post-September 11 America

    Open Access•Peter Trubowitz, Nicole Mellow•International Politics•2011

  • Finding the water’s edge

    Open Access•Sarah Maxey•International Politics•2021

  • Perils of Polarization for U.S. Foreign Policy

    Kenneth A Schultz•The Washington Quarterly•2017

  • Sectional Biases in Congress on Foreign Policy

    John M Swarthout, George Grassmuck et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1952

  • "Meeting the Communist Threat" Truman to Reagan

    H W Brands, Thomas G Paterson•Journal of American History•1989

  • The Instruments of American Foreign Policy

    Charles W Yost•Foreign Affairs•1971

  • Ideological Polarization and the Vanishing of Marginals

    Jeffrey W Ladewig•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Unanswered threats

    Randall L Schweller•Unanswered Threats•2006

  • Free Hand Abroad, Divide and Rule at Home

    Open Access•Jack Snyder, Robert Y Shapiro et al.•World Politics•2009

  • Do Partisan Types Stop at the Water’s Edge

    Joshua D Kertzer, Deborah Jordan Brooks et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Negative Partisanship

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven W Webster•Political Psychology•2018

  • Party Polarization in the US Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Politics•2006

  • Ideological structure and foreign policy preferences

    Miroslav Nincic, Jennifer M Ramos•Journal of Political Ideologies•2010

  • The Return to Personalistic Rule

    Open Access•Susan L Shirk•Journal of democracy•2018

  • Theory, Policy, and Resource Cartels

    Open Access•Davis B Bobrow, Robert T Kudrle•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1976

  • Politics at the Water's Edge

    Open Access•Joanne Gowa•International Organization•1998

  • Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • The Nature of Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Nicholas C Dias, Nicholas Dias et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Division at the Water’s Edge

    Open Access•Gyung-Ho Jeong, Paul J Quirk•American Politics Research•2019

  • Political Orientation, Party Affiliation, and American Attitudes Towards China

    Open Access•Peter Gries, Peter Hays Gries et al.•Journal of Chinese Political…•2010

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • The Erosion of American National Interests

    Samuel P Huntington•Foreign Affairs•1997

  • The New Apathy

    James M Lindsay•Foreign Affairs•2000

  • The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton, Joshua Clinton et al.•American Political Science Review•2004

  • Economic Instability and Military Strength

    Open Access•F Block•Latin American Politics and Society•1980

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae