Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Personalist Leadership and Corruption

Evidence From Third Wave Democracies

Bibliographic Data

ID6445394
AuthorsTatiana Kostadinova (0000-0002-6799-9571, Florida International University, corresponding author), Milena I Neshkova (0000-0003-3108-6014, Florida International University)
Year2025
Volume53
Issue4
Publication date2025-07-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1555-5623 • E-ISSN: 1747-1346
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/polp.70056
OpenAlexW4412638528
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited57

This study investigates whether having parties with a dominant leader in the national government is associated with more corruption in political institutions. We argue that personalist regimes tend to foster clientelist networks while weakening the institutions of oversight. Engagement in corrupt activities is shaped by actors' expectations for gains and costs, but in a system where power is concentrated at the top, loyalty is valued more than professionalism, and the behavior of the leader is hard to predict. Data from 32 Eastern European and Latin American countries relate personalist governments to higher levels of grand (political) and petty (bureaucratic) corruption. This relationship becomes more pronounced the longer a regime stays in power. Our findings carry implications for how personalist leadership brought through democratic elections may undermine accountability, fair governance, and the quality of democracy in general

Criminology · Language change · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Third wave · Corruption and Economic Development · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Economic Growth and Development · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Introduction to the Special Issue

    Open Access•Tatiana Kostadinova, Milena I Neshkova•Politics & Policy•2025

  • Rebuilding Leviathan

    Open Access•Anna Grzymala-Busse•Rebuilding Leviathan•2007

  • Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization

    Scott Mainwaring, Scott P Mainwaring•Rethinking Party Systems in the…•1999

  • Votes for Survival

    Open Access•Simeon Nichter•Votes for Survival•2018

  • Clientelism and portfolio diversification

    Open Access•Beatriz Magaloni, Alberto Díaz-Cayeros et al.•Patrons, Clients and Policies•2007

  • Culture matters

    Lawrence E Harrison, Samuel P Huntington•Culture matters•2000

  • The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform

    Open Access•Johann Graf Lambsdorff•Institutional Economics of…•2007

  • The Logic of Political Survival

    Bruce Bueno De Mesquita, Alastair Smith et al.•The logic of political survival•2003

  • Decentralization and corruption

    Open Access•Raymond Fisman, Roberta Gatti•Journal of Public Economics•2002

  • Does Changing Electoral Systems Affect (Corrupt) Particularistic Exchanges? Evidence from the Italian Case

    Open Access•Simona Piattoni, Matteo F N Giglioli•Politics and Governance•2020

  • Personalist Parties in the Third Wave of Democratization

    Open Access•Barry Steven Levitt, Tatiana Kostadinova•Politics & Policy•2014

  • Toward a Theory of Personalist Parties

    Open Access•Tatiana Kostadinova, Barry Steven Levitt•Politics & Policy•2014

  • Sources of Corruption in Authoritarian Regimes

    Open Access•Eric C C Chang, Eric Chang et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2010

  • Civil service management and corruption

    Open Access•Jan‐hinrik Meyer‐sahling, Kim Sass Mikkelsen et al.•Public Administration•2018

  • Democratic Experiments in Africa

    Open Access•Michael Bratton, Gail M Gerhart et al.•Democratic Experiments in Africa•1997

  • The Quality of Democracy in Eastern Europe. Public Preferences and Policy Reforms

    Radosław Markowski•West European Politics•2011

  • The Effectiveness of Administrative Reform in New Democracies

    Open Access•Milena I Neshkova, Tatiana Kostadinova•Public Administration Review•2012

  • Dynamics of regime personalization and patron–client networks in Russia, 1999–2014

    Annette Baturo, Alexander Baturo et al.•Post-Soviet Affairs•2016

  • Party Types in the Age of Personalized Politics

    Open Access•Gideon Rahat•Perspectives on Politics•2024

  • Transparency is not Enough

    Open Access•Catharina Lindstedt, Daniel Naurin•International Political Science…•2010

  • How Personalist Politics Is Changing Democracies

    Open Access•Elizabeth Frantz, Erica Frantz et al.•Journal of democracy•2021

  • Varieties of connections, varieties of corruption

    Open Access•A S Harris, Jan‐hinrik Meyer‐sahling et al.•Governance•2023

  • Varieties of clientelism across political parties

    Open Access•Masaaki Higashijima, Hidekuni Washida•European Political Science Review•2024

  • Do populist governments reduce corruption

    Tatiana Kostadinova•East European Politics•2024

  • Analytical perspectives on varieties of clientelism

    Kerem Yıldırım, Herbert Kitschelt•Democratization•2020

  • Praising the leader

    Open Access•Lennart Brunkert, Christian Von Soest•Democratization•2023

  • The perils of personalism

    Matthew Rhodes-Purdy, Raúl L Madrid•Democratization•2020

  • How clientelism varies

    Ward Berenschot, Edward Aspinall•Democratization•2020

  • Pathways to democratization in personalist dictatorships

    Elizabeth Frantz, Erica Frantz et al.•Democratization•2017

  • Personalist ruling parties in democracies

    Elizabeth Frantz, Andrea Kendall-Taylor et al.•Democratization•2022

  • How Personalist Parties Undermine State Capacity in Democracies

    Open Access•Jia Li, Joseph Wright•Comparative Political Studies•2023

  • Beyond Clientelism

    Open Access•Anna Grzymala-Busse•Comparative Political Studies•2008

  • Political Parties, Clientelism, and Bureaucratic Reform

    Open Access•Cesi Cruz, Philip Keefer•Comparative Political Studies•2015

  • Aid Effectiveness and the Politics of Personalism

    Open Access•Joseph Wright•Comparative Political Studies•2010

  • Clientelism's Red Herrings

    Open Access•Allen Hicken, Noah L Nathan•Annual Review of Political Science•2020

  • What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research

    Daniel Treisman•Annual Review of Political Science•2007

  • Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes

    Isabela Mares, Lauren E Young et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2016

  • Varieties of Clientelism

    Open Access•Jordan Gans-Morse, Jordan Gans‐morse et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Electoral Systems, District Magnitude and Corruption

    Open Access•Eric C C Chang, Miriam A Golden et al.•British Journal of Political…•2007

  • Political Appointments and Coalition Management in Brazil, 2007-2010

    Open Access•Sérgio Rodrigo Marchiori Praca, Anthony Freitas et al.•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2011

  • Making Clientelism Work

    Chappell Lawson, Kenneth F Greene•Comparative Politics•2014

  • What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions

    Open Access•Bo Rothstein, Jan Teorell•Governance•2008

  • The Constitutional Dilemma of Economic Liberty

    Open Access•Barry R Weingast•The Journal of Economic…•2005

  • Person-based politics in Italy and Slovenia

    Open Access•Matevž Tomšič, Lea Prijon•International Social Science…•2013

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae