Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Algorithmic formalization

Impacts on administrative processes

Bibliographic Data

ID6446564
AuthorsAntonio Cordella (0000-0002-4468-7807, London School of Economics and Political Science London UK), Francesco Gualdi (0000-0003-0449-9884, London School of Economics and Political Science London UK, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume103
Issue2
Pages441-466
Publication date2024-08-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3298 • E-ISSN: 1467-9299
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/padm.13030
OpenAlexW4401916482
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited59

This paper investigates the influence of algorithms on the administrative processes within public organizations, utilizing the foundational theory of formalization from Walsh and Dewar (1987) as a framework. Introduces the concept of “algorithmic formalization”, a new form of formalization induced by the adoption of algorithms, which fundamentally alters administrative workflows. Focusing on COMPAS algorithm used in the US judiciary for risk assessment, the paper illustrates how the algorithm serves multiple roles – as code, channel, and standard – systematizing administrative processes related to risk assessment and judicial decisions. By delving into COMPAS case study, the research sheds light on the novel concept of algorithmic formalization, emphasizing its significant repercussions for analyzing and applying algorithmic administrative processes

Business · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Legal and Policy Issues

  • AI Public Value Creation

    Open Access•Antonio Cordella, Francesco Gualdi•Public Administration•2026

  • Fairness Perception, Administrative Burden, and Social Welfare Participation

    Open Access•Yongdong Shen, Wenchi Wei et al.•Public Administration•2026

  • Digital surveillance governance

    Open Access•Jonas Lund‐tønnesen•Public Management Review•2026

  • Algorithmic Governance

    Open Access•Jaakko Hillo, Isak Vento et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • A Replication of “Explaining Why the Computer Says No

    Open Access•Xuemei Fang, Hua-Yu Zhou et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • Holding AI Accountable Like Herding Cats

    Open Access•Rui Liu, Ruoxuan Liu et al.•Public Administration•2026

  • From Discretion to Calculation

    Open Access•A Heikkinen, Minna Van Gerven et al.•Public Administration•2026

  • Public Encounters and Government Chatbots

    Open Access•Art Alishani, Vincent Homburg et al.•Public Administration Review•2025

  • Machines Who Think

    Pamela McCorduck, Cli Cfe•Machines Who Think•2004

  • Media Technologies

    Christopher Kelty, E Gabriella Coleman et al.•Media Technologies•2014

  • Managing Artificial Intelligence

    Nicholas Berente, Bin Gu et al.•MIS Quarterly•2021

  • Artificial Intelligence in Organizations

    Georg von Krogh•Academy of Management Discoveries•2018

  • Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms

    Open Access•Kirsten Martins, Kirsten Martin•Journal of Business Ethics•2019

  • Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact

    Open Access•Alexandra Chouldechova•Big Data•2017

  • Economy and Society

    Claus Wittich, Guenther Roth et al.•Economy and Society•2013

  • The Dark Sides of Artificial Intelligence

    Bernd W Wirtz, Jan C Weyerer et al.•International Journal of Public…•2020

  • Artificial Discretion as a Tool of Governance

    Open Access•Matthew Young, Justin B Bullock et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2019

  • Qualitative Case Study Methodology

    Open Access•Pamela Baxter, Susan Jack et al.•Qualitative Report•2015

  • New Public Management

    Open Access•Tom Christensen, Per Lægreid•Journal of Political Philosophy•2002

  • Artificial Intelligence in Government

    Open Access•Rony Medaglia, Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2021

  • Artificial intelligence and speedy trial in the judiciary

    Open Access•Weslei Gomes de Sousa, Rafael Antunes Fidelis et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector

    Open Access•Tara Qian Sun, Rony Medaglia•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Rationality and politics of algorithms. Will the promise of big data survive the dynamics of public decision making

    Open Access•H G Van der Voort, Bram Klievink et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Opportunity for renewal or disruptive force? How artificial intelligence alters democratic politics

    Open Access•Pascal D König, Georg Wenzelburger•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • Computing the everyday

    Cristina Alaimo, Jannis Kallinikos•The Information Society•2017

  • Social Equity

    Open Access•Mary E Guy, Sean Mccandle et al.•Public Administration Review•2012

  • Assessing Qualitative Studies in Public Administration Research

    Open Access•Sofi Ospina, Sonia M Ospina et al.•Public Administration Review•2017

  • Public Administration Challenges in the World of AI and Bots

    Open Access•Pankaj Agarwal, P K Agarwal•Public Administration Review•2018

  • The New Public Service

    Open Access•Robert B Denhardt, Janet Vinzant Denhardt•Public Administration Review•2000

  • The future of public administration research

    Open Access•Bruce D Mcdonald, Jeremy L Hall et al.•Public Administration•2022

  • Assessing public value failure in government adoption of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Daniel S Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson Schiff et al.•Public Administration•2021

  • Can details depoliticize? An examination of the formalization strategy

    Open Access•Jesper Asring Jessen Hansen•Public Administration•2022

  • How rediscovering nodality can improve democratic governance in a digital world

    Open Access•Helen Z Margetts, Helen Margetts et al.•Public Administration•2023

  • Algorithms in the public sector. Why context matters

    Open Access•Georg Wenzelburger, Pascal D König et al.•Public Administration•2022

  • A machine learning approach to open public comments for policymaking

    Open Access•Alex Ingrams, Sarah Giest et al.•Information Polity•2020

  • Explaining Why the Computer Says No

    Open Access•Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Accountable Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Madalina Busuioc•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Algorithmization of Bureaucratic Organizations

    Open Access•Albert Meijer, Albert J Meijer et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Digital Government, Open Architecture, and Innovation

    Open Access•Jerry Fishenden, Mark Thompson•Journal of Public Administration…•2013

  • Urban E-Government Initiatives and Environmental Decision Performance in Korea

    J H Lim, Jung‐eun Lim et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2006

  • Comparing Public and Private Organizations

    Hal G Rainey, Barry Bozeman•Journal of Public Administration…•2000

  • Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service

    Justin B Bullock, Justin Bullock et al.•Information Polity•2020

  • Algorithmic transparency and bureaucratic discretion

    J Ignacio Criado Grande, Julián Martínez Valero et al.•Information Polity•2020

  • Big Data and AI – A transformational shift for government

    Open Access•Irina Pencheva, Marc Esteves et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2020

  • Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management

    Open Access•William L Waugh, Gregory Streib•Public Administration Review•2006

  • A Public Management for All Seasons

    Open Access•Christopher Hood•Public Administration•1991

Unique citing works8
Citations per year8
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae