The Problem of Disinformation
A Critical Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6451934 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timothy Hayward (0000-0003-3433-399X, School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh School of Social and Political Science, Edinburgh, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-23 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Epistemology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-1728 • E-ISSN: 1464-5297 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02691728.2024.2346127 |
| OpenAlex | W4398141451 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
The term disinformation is generally used to refer to information that is false and harmful, by contrast with misinformation (false but harmless) and malinformation (harmful but true); disinformation is also generally understood to involve coordination and to be intentionally false and/or harmful. However, particular studies rarely apply all these criteria when discussing cases. Doing so would involve applying at least three distinct problem framings: an epistemic framing to detect that a proposition in circulation is false, a behavioural framing to detect the coordinated efforts at communicating that proposition, and a security framing to identify threats or risks of harm attendant on widespread belief in the proposition. As for the question of intentionality, different kinds of clues can be picked up within each framing, although none alone is likely to be conclusive. Yet particular studies tend to centre on or prioritise a single framing. Many today aim to make policy recommendations about combatting disinformation, and they prioritise security concerns over the demands of epistemic diligence. This carries a real risk of disinformation research being 'weaponised' against inconvenient truths. Against combative approaches, this article argues for a critical approach which recognizes the importance of epistemic diligence and transparency about normative assumptions
Disinformation · Epistemology · Political science · Social media · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy
Fake News and Partisan Epistemology
Stop talking about fake news!
Ready-to-(ab)use
The Applied Epistemology of Official Stories
Fake News
Fake News and Conceptual Ethics
What's New About Fake News
Disinformation, Misinformation and Limits on Freedom of Expression During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Conspiracy Theories
The Tukhachevsky Affair
Coordinated Behavior on Social Media in 2019 UK General Election
Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy
Disinformation as Political Communication
Characterizing the 2016 Russian IRA influence campaign
Pragmatics for argumentation
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |