Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond ‘Infodemic

Complexity, Knowledge and Populism in Covid-19 Crisis Governance

Bibliographic Data

ID6451963
AuthorsMarko-Luka Zubčić (0000-0002-7637-2455, University of Rijeka, corresponding author), Gabriele Giacomini (0000-0001-8482-7643, University of Udine, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume39
Issue1
Pages56-76
Publication date2024-06-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Epistemology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-1728 • E-ISSN: 1464-5297
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02691728.2024.2356528
OpenAlexW4399335223
LanguageEN
References cited53

The concept of the 'infodemic' has become a popular explanation for the rejection of anti-COVID-19 crisis governance measures. In this paper, we argue that infodemic is an inherent property of society under free institutions misused to pursue an epistemically vicious political epistemology. Furthermore, we provide an alternative account of political epistemology of COVID-19 governance and popular resistance to it. Namely, we argue that 1) pandemics represent a complex problem, and some level of resistance to governance which restricts liberties while informed by ongoing scientific and political learning processes is inevitable, and 2) the resistance is exacerbated by the history of technocratization of governance and the exclusionary socio-economic inequalities which condition political and epistemic deficiencies easily exploitable by the political entrepreneurs of right-wing populism, particularly under the conditions of social media which gamifies public discourse. Thus, we argue, the correct response to the cultures of rejection of anti-COVID-19 measures is to change the underlying political and economic conditions and not to limit speech or restrict franchise as the infodemic diagnosis suggests

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Corporate governance · Economics · Management · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Positive economics · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Sociology · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Virology

  • Republic

    Cass R Sunstein•#Republic•2017

  • Capital in the Twenty-First Century

    Thomas Piketty•Capital in the Twenty-First Century•2014

  • On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays

    John Stuart Mill, Mark Philp et al.•On Liberty, Utilitarianism and…•2015

  • The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•Erkenntnis•2010

  • From populism to the “plandemic”

    Open Access•Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Robert A Huber et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2021

  • The entrepreneurial state

    Mariana Mazzucato•Soundings•2011

  • The Epistemology of Democracy

    Open Access•Elizabeth Anderson, Liz Anderson•EPISTÉMÈ•2006

  • The dark side of technology

    Open Access•Ivan B Dylko, Ivan Dylko et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2017

  • Stop talking about fake news!

    Joshua Habgood-Coote•Inquiry•2019

  • Cultural Backlash

    Open Access•P Norris, Ronald Inglehart•Cultural Backlash•2019

  • The Epistemology of Democracy

    Hana Samaržija, Quassim Cassam•The Epistemology of Democracy•2023

  • Against Democracy

    Jason Brennan•Against Democracy•2016

  • The Tyranny of the Ideal

    Andrew Tsz Wan Hung, Evangelical Philosophical Society•Philosophia Christi•2017

  • Rescuing Public Reason Liberalism’s Accessibility Requirement

    Open Access•Gabriele Badano, Matteo Bonotti•Law and Philosophy•2020

  • The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology

    Michael Hannon, Jeroen De Ridder•Routledge Handbook of Political…•2021

  • The Seductions of Clarity

    Open Access•C Thi Nguyen•Royal Institute of Philosophy…•2021

  • Public justification and expert disagreement over non-pharmaceutical interventions for the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Marcus Dahlquist, Henrik D Kugelberg•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Knowledge, Expertise and Science Advice During Covid-19

    Open Access•Maru Mormina•Social Epistemology•2022

  • An Epistemic Problem for Epistocracy

    Open Access•María Pía Méndez•Social Epistemology•2022

  • Power without Knowledge

    Jeffrey Friedman•Power Without Knowledge•2019

  • Games

    C Thi Nguyen•Games•2020

  • The Tyranny of the Ideal

    Gerald Gaus, Gerald F Gaus•Tyranny of the Ideal•2016

  • The Division of Cognitive Labor

    Philip Kitcher•The Journal of Philosophy•1990

  • Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy

    Gaël Fain, Joseph Alois Schumpeter et al.•Capitalism, socialism, and…•2010

  • Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy

    Gaël Fain, Joseph Alois Schumpeter et al.•Capitalism, socialism, and…•2010

  • Cultures of rejection in the Covid-19 crisis

    Open Access•B Opratko, Manuela Bojadžijev et al.•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2021

  • How populism and conservative media fuel conspiracy beliefs about Covid-19 and what it means for Covid-19 behaviors

    Open Access•Dominik A Stecuła, Mark A Pickup•Research & Politics•2021

  • The paradox of pluralism

    Open Access•Gabriele Giacomini•Catalan Journal of Communication…•2021

  • Bounded rationality in social science

    Open Access•Herbert A Simon•Mind & Society•2000

  • Science as Public Reason and the Controversiality Objection

    Open Access•Klemens Kappel•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2021

  • Quadratic voting and the public good

    Open Access•Eric A Posner, E Glen Weyl•Public Choice•2017

  • Disagreement without discovery and the epistemological argument for freedom from poverty

    Open Access•Marko-Luka Zubčić•Synthese•2022

  • Ignorance, norms and instrumental pluralism

    Open Access•Marko-Luka Zubčić•Synthese•2021

  • The Independence Thesis

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, Conor Mayo‐Wilson et al.•Philosophy of Science•2011

  • Unmoored

    Kristina Stojanović-Čehajić, Marko-Luka Zubčić•Patterns of Prejudice•2022

  • Technological Seduction and Self-Radicalization

    Open Access•Mark Alfano, J Adam Carter et al.•Journal of the American…•2018

  • Deliberation and disagreement

    Open Access•Hélène Landemore, Sarah E Page et al.•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2014

  • From the organization to the division of cognitive labor

    Open Access•Fred D’agostino•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2009

  • An Epistemic Account of Populism

    Open Access•Julian F Müller•EPISTÉMÈ•2023

  • Testing Theories of American Politics

    Open Access•Martin Gilens, Benjamin I Page•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • The Populist Zeitgeist

    Open Access•Cas Mudde•Government and Opposition•2004

  • Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

    Open Access•Horst W J Rittel, Melvin M Webber•Policy Sciences•1973

  • Credibility and trust of information in online environments

    Open Access•Miriam J Metzger, Andrew J Flanagin•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Donald Trump Is My President

    Open Access•M Bastos, Johan Farkas•Social Media + Society•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae