Beyond ‘Infodemic
Complexity, Knowledge and Populism in Covid-19 Crisis Governance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6451963 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marko-Luka Zubčić (0000-0002-7637-2455, University of Rijeka, corresponding author), Gabriele Giacomini (0000-0001-8482-7643, University of Udine, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 56-76 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Epistemology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-1728 • E-ISSN: 1464-5297 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02691728.2024.2356528 |
| OpenAlex | W4399335223 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
The concept of the 'infodemic' has become a popular explanation for the rejection of anti-COVID-19 crisis governance measures. In this paper, we argue that infodemic is an inherent property of society under free institutions misused to pursue an epistemically vicious political epistemology. Furthermore, we provide an alternative account of political epistemology of COVID-19 governance and popular resistance to it. Namely, we argue that 1) pandemics represent a complex problem, and some level of resistance to governance which restricts liberties while informed by ongoing scientific and political learning processes is inevitable, and 2) the resistance is exacerbated by the history of technocratization of governance and the exclusionary socio-economic inequalities which condition political and epistemic deficiencies easily exploitable by the political entrepreneurs of right-wing populism, particularly under the conditions of social media which gamifies public discourse. Thus, we argue, the correct response to the cultures of rejection of anti-COVID-19 measures is to change the underlying political and economic conditions and not to limit speech or restrict franchise as the infodemic diagnosis suggests
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Corporate governance · Economics · Management · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Positive economics · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Sociology · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Virology
Republic
Capital in the Twenty-First Century
On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays
The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity
From populism to the “plandemic”
The entrepreneurial state
The Epistemology of Democracy
The dark side of technology
Stop talking about fake news!
Cultural Backlash
The Epistemology of Democracy
Against Democracy
The Tyranny of the Ideal
Rescuing Public Reason Liberalism’s Accessibility Requirement
The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology
The Seductions of Clarity
Public justification and expert disagreement over non-pharmaceutical interventions for the Covid-19 pandemic
Knowledge, Expertise and Science Advice During Covid-19
An Epistemic Problem for Epistocracy
Power without Knowledge
Games
The Tyranny of the Ideal
The Division of Cognitive Labor
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Cultures of rejection in the Covid-19 crisis
How populism and conservative media fuel conspiracy beliefs about Covid-19 and what it means for Covid-19 behaviors
The paradox of pluralism
Bounded rationality in social science
Science as Public Reason and the Controversiality Objection
Quadratic voting and the public good
Disagreement without discovery and the epistemological argument for freedom from poverty
Ignorance, norms and instrumental pluralism
The Independence Thesis
Unmoored
Technological Seduction and Self-Radicalization
Deliberation and disagreement
From the organization to the division of cognitive labor
An Epistemic Account of Populism
Testing Theories of American Politics
The Populist Zeitgeist
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Credibility and trust of information in online environments
Donald Trump Is My President
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |