The Testimonial Double Bind for Disabled People
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6451967 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Avram Hiller (0000-0003-4110-0166, Portland State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 436-448 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Epistemology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-1728 • E-ISSN: 1464-5297 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02691728.2025.2525227 |
| OpenAlex | W4412455936 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 42 |
Disabled people face a testimonial double bind: Either (1) they give entirely positive testimony about their disability, which may not be believed, or (2) they give some negative testimony about their disability, which either (2a) may not be believed, (2b) will risk reinforcing false and harmful stereotypes, or (2c) will risk damaging disability rights. While (1) has been discussed to a significant extent in the literature, (2) has been discussed to a much lesser extent, and a goal of this paper is to explore (2) in more detail. I further argue that this testimonial double bind may cause problems for the tenability of a unified disability identity. That’s because disabled people who are more likely to give more negative testimony may have quite different interests than those who give primarily positive testimony. And if a central component of being disabled is having solidarity with other disabled people, then the existence of different interests is a challenge to there being a unified disability identity. Even worse, this challenge to disability identity can occur both socially and intrapersonally. After having clarified the nature of the testimonial double bind for disabled people, I point towards ways to overcome it
Advertising · Business · Sociology · Testimonial · Communication · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Disability Rights and Representation · Legal principles and applications · Psychology
Learning from My Daughter
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability
The Minority Body
Cognitive Disabilities, Forms of Exclusion, and the Ethics of Social Interactions
How Should (and Shouldn’t) We Think About Profound Intellectual Disability
Chronic Pain, Mere-Differences, and Disability Variantism
Epistemic Arrogance, Moral Harm, and Dementia
How Does Disability Affect Wellbeing? A Literature Review and Philosophical Analysis
Oppressive Double Binds
Foucault and the Government of Disability
Epistemic Injustice and Illness
Trusting experts and epistemic humility in disability
From “She Would Say That, Wouldn't She?” to “Does She Take Sugar?” Epistemic Injustice and Disability
Health professionals, disability, and assisted suicide
Claiming loss in disability
Conceptualising the psycho‐emotional aspects of disability and impairment
Towards an Affirmation Model of Disability
Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing
You Look Fine!”
Replies to Commentaries
Explaining Low Subjective Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities in Europe
Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being
Toward a theory of schizophrenia
A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |