Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public Rights Orientations and Views on Long‐Term Care Options for Children in the Child Protection System

An Analysis of Representative Samples of Adults in California, USA and Norway

Bibliographic Data

ID6452045
AuthorsJill D Berrick (0000-0002-5795-4206, School of Social Welfare University of California Berkeley California USA), Hege Stein Helland (0000-0002-9169-9990, Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism, Department of Government University of Bergen Bergen Norway), Marit Skivenes (0000-0002-5326-6692, Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism, Department of Government University of Bergen Bergen Norway, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume59
Issue5
Pages854-864
Publication date2024-10-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Policy and Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/spol.13081
OpenAlexW4403174257
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited45

This study examines a representative sample of adults in California (USA) and Norway, and their attitudes toward adoption versus foster care in a child protection case. The results show that a majority of people favour adoption for a child who has been removed due to maltreatment and cannot be reunified with birth parents. The study examines if people's rights orientation, favouring children or adults, or favouring birth parents or adoptive parents, or their institutional context explain their preferences about long‐term care options. Data material consist of representative samples of the population in California (USA) and Norway ( n = 2222), using a vignette survey design. Findings suggest that individuals with a child rights position favour adoption, but attitudes about birth parents' and adoptive parents' rights are not related to care option choices. Institutional context, anchored in policy feedback literature, partly explains the preference for adoption and the population's rights orientation. Further studies are necessary to confirm the role of rights attitudes and institutional context

Political science · Term (time · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Medicine · Psychology · Gerontology

  • Religion and Continuity for Children in Care—An Examination of Public Views in 40 Countries

    Open Access•Zacky Dhaffa Pratama, Marit Skivenes•Social Sciences•2026

  • The Future of Childhood

    Alan Prout•Future of Childhood•2004

  • Child Protection Systems

    Neil Gilbert, Nigel Parton et al.•Child protection systems•2011

  • Combatting Child Abuse

    Neil Gilbert, Neii Gilbert•Combatting Child Abuse•1997

  • Children's understanding of adoption

    David M Brodzinsky•Professional Psychology Research…•2011

  • The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research into Social Work Values

    Open Access•Tom Wilks•Qualitative Social Work•2004

  • The Gift Relationship

    Richard Titmuss, Richard Morris Titmuss•Gift Relationship•2018

  • Contested Welfare States

    Open Access•Jan Mewes, Steffen Mau et al.•Contested welfare states•2012

  • A Study of Adopted Children, Their Environment, and Development

    Mogens Nygaard Christoffersen, Mogens Christoffersen•Adoption Quarterly•2012

  • Children, Rights and Childhood

    Open Access•Michael D Freeman, Michael Freeman•Children & Society•2006

  • A longitudinal investigation of infants and out-of-home care

    Joseph Magruder, Jill D Berrick•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2022

  • Comparing population views on state responsibility for children in vulnerable situations – the role of institutional context and socio-demographic characteristics

    Open Access•Hege Stein Helland, Siri Hansen Pedersen et al.•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2022

  • Children’s rights and parents’ rights

    Open Access•Jill D Berrick, Marit Skivenes et al.•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • Exploring populations view on thresholds and reasons for child protection intervention – comparing England, Norway, Poland and Romania

    Open Access•Marit Skivenes•European Journal of Social Work•2021

  • Restricting family life - an examination of citizens’ views on state interventions and parental freedom in eight European countries

    Open Access•Marit Skivenes, Asgeir Falch‐eriksen et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2023

  • Long‐term foster care or adoption? The evidence examined

    Open Access•John Triseliotis•Child & Family Social Work•2002

  • Securing permanence for children in care

    Open Access•Marit Skivenes, Rami Benbenishty•Child & Family Social Work•2022

  • Citizens' views in four jurisdictions on placement policies for maltreated children

    Open Access•Marit Skivenes, June Thoburn•Child & Family Social Work•2017

  • Exploring Leave Policy Preferences

    Isabel Valarino, Ann‐zofie Duvander et al.•Social Politics International…•2017

  • Populations trust in the child protection system

    Open Access•Marit Skivenes, Rami Benbenishty•Journal of European Social Policy•2022

  • Theorising Children’s Rights and Child Welfare Paradigms

    Thomas Waldock•The International Journal of…•2016

  • Cognitive, educational and self-support outcomes of long-term foster care versus adoption. A Swedish national cohort study

    Open Access•Bo Vinnerljung, Anders Hjern•Children and Youth Services Review•2011

  • Previous life experiences and the vulnerability of children adopted from out-of-home care

    Open Access•Susan Tregeagle, Lynne Moggach et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2019

  • Public perceptions of child protection, children’s rights, and personal values

    Open Access•Jill D Berrick, Marit Skivenes et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2023

  • The justifications for terminating parental rights and adoption in the United States

    Open Access•Øyvind S Tefre, Øyvind Tefre•Children and Youth Services Review•2015

  • Legitimate child protection interventions and the dimension of confidence

    Open Access•Mathea Loen, Marit Skivenes•Journal of Social Policy•2025

  • Sovereignty, Substance, and Public Support for European Courts’ Human Rights Rulings

    Open Access•Mikael Rask Madsen, Juan A Mayoral et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Social Values and Cross-National Differences in Attitudes towards Welfare

    Open Access•Gizem Arikan, Gizem Arıkan et al.•Political Studies•2015

  • Adoption in the service of child protection

    Jesús Palacios, Salomé Adroher et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2019

  • Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion

    Stanley Feldman•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement

    Open Access•Shalom H Schwartz, Gila Melech et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2001

  • Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution

    Svallfor, S Svallfors•European Sociological Review•1997

  • Parental Freedom in the Context of Risk to the Child

    Open Access•Jill D Berrick, Marit Skivenes et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2023

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae