Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An ‘interface first’ bureaucracy

Interface design, universal credit and the digital welfare state

Bibliographic Data

ID6452099
AuthorsJed Meers (0000-0001-7993-3062, York Law School University of York York UK, corresponding author), Sharon Halliday (0000-0001-5107-6783, Strathcylde Law School University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK), Joe Tomlinson (0000-0002-4512-7799, York Law School University of York York UK)
Year2024
Volume59
Issue1
Pages119-134
Publication date2024-06-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Policy and Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/spol.13053
OpenAlexW4400217966
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited19

The front‐line of the welfare state is increasingly not a letter, phone call or face‐to‐face visit, but an online user‐interface. This ‘interface first’ bureaucracy is a fundamental reshaping of social security administration, but the design and operation of these interfaces is poorly understood. Drawing on interview data from senior civil servants, welfare benefits advisors and claimants on the UK's flagship Universal Credit working‐age benefit, this paper is a detailed analysis of the role played by interfaces in the modern welfare state. Providing examples from across the Universal Credit system, it sets out a five‐fold typology of user‐interface design elements in the social security context: (i) structuring data input, (ii) interaction architecture, (iii) operative controls, (iv) prompting and priming, and (v) integrations. The paper concludes by considering the implications of an ‘interface first’ welfare bureaucracy for future research

Bureaucracy · Computer security · Context (archaeology · Interface (matter · Operating system · Political science · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law

  • The Digital Welfare State

    Open Access•Scarlet Wilcock, Georgia Van Toorn•Big Data & Society•2026

  • Self-defeating targeting

    Open Access•Emma Álvarez-Cronin, José Antonio Noguera Ferrer•Journal of International and…•2025

  • Administrative burden as a constraint on freedom in the modern welfare state

    Open Access•Jeremiah Thomas Brown, Eleanor Malbon•Australian Journal of Public…•2024

  • Challenges for individual assessment in digitalised welfare administration

    Open Access•Amanda Tuomola, Paula Saikkonen•International Journal of…•2026

  • Navigating Digital Welfare

    Open Access•Hayley Bennett•Social Policy and Administration•2025

  • Devolving digitalisation

    Open Access•Hayley Bennett, Jed Meers•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2025

  • Digital first Universal Credit and street-level discretion within screen-level implementation

    Open Access•Sharon Wright, Laura Robertson et al.•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2025

  • An ‘interface first’ welfare state

    Open Access•Hayley Bennett, Jed Meers•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2025

  • Reducing Universal Credit for rent costs

    Izzie Salter•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2025

  • Digital conditionality

    Open Access•John Morrison•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2025

  • Citizens putting in the work

    Open Access•Jeremiah Thomas Brown•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2025

  • Introduction to the Special Issue on Activation and the Digital Welfare State

    Open Access•Michael Mcgann, Mark Considine et al.•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2025

  • Administrative burdens, behavioural insights and economic dignity

    Open Access•Jeremiah Thomas Brown•Australian Journal of Political…•2025

  • When benefit eligibility and patient-led care intersect. Living in the UK with chronic illness

    Open Access•William Day, R Shaw•Journal of Health Psychology•2022

  • Universal Credit and Automated Decision Making

    Open Access•Rita Griffiths•Social Policy and Society•2021

  • Universal Credit, deductions and ‘sexually transmitted’ debt

    Open Access•Rita Griffiths, Ruth Cain•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2022

  • The Form of Forms

    Open Access•Aisling Ryan•Social & Legal Studies•2023

  • Smooth Operators, Predictable Glitches

    Open Access•Jennifer Raso•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2023

  • What is in a form? Examining the complexity of application forms and administrative burden

    Open Access•Jeremiah Thomas Brown, George Carey et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2021

  • Emerging modes of digitalisation in the delivery of welfare‐to‐work

    Open Access•Sarah Ball, Michael Mcgann et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2023

  • Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare

    Open Access•Jannick Schou, Anja Svejgaard Pors•Social Policy and Administration•2019

  • Talk or type? The effect of digital interfaces on citizens' satisfaction with standardized public services

    Open Access•Christine Prokop, Melissa Tepe•Public Administration•2021

  • Discrimination at the Interface

    Open Access•Jed Meers•Modern Law Review•2024

  • Digital exclusion and distance in the British welfare system

    Open Access•Alistair Sheldrick•Geoforum•2023

  • A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

    Open Access•Donald R Thomas, David R Thomas•American Journal of Evaluation•2006

  • Can Robots Understand Welfare? Exploring Machine Bureaucracies in Welfare-to-Work

    Open Access•Mark Considine, Michael Mcgann et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2022

Unique citing works13
Citations per year6,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae