Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Can democracy save children’s lives? Addressing the constitutional problem of expertise

Bibliographic Data

ID6452533
AuthorsB Laurent (0000-0001-7901-8518, École des Mines de Paris, Paris, France, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume55
Issue2
Pages288-294
Publication date2025-01-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Studies of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/03063127241310461
PMID39760336
OpenAlexW4406102396
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited12

This comment critically examines Collins, Evans, and Reyes-Galindo’s (CE&RG) concept of ‘virtual diversity’, proposed as a norm to safeguard scientific expertise in policy-making. CE&RG argue that scientists should acquire ‘interactional expertise’ in relevant ‘non-scientific domains’, enabling informed policy advice while preserving scientific integrity. This comment describes CE&RG’s dualist approach, which separates epistemic and political concerns, and discusses its implications. It shows that for virtual diversity to contribute to the quality of and trust in expertise, this approach needs to be radically re-worked to include legitimacy-building processes. Using examples such as South Africa’s AIDS policy and the COVID-19 pandemic, the comment argues that defending expertise requires ensuring the robustness of both scientific and political representations, of, in other terms, addressing expertise as a constitutional problem. Without a broader critical constitutional analysis, CE&RG’s proposal risks reinforcing the crisis of expertise it seeks to remedy

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Democracy · Diversity (politics · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Child and Adolescent Health · Children's Rights and Participation · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Law · Medicine

  • Virtual diversity

    Open Access•Sergio Sismondo•Social Studies of Science•2025

  • Virtual diversity revisited

    Open Access•Harry Collins, R Evans et al.•Social Studies of Science•2025

  • Is glacier science undone, or just enough for a just transition? Reflections from Andean Mines

    Open Access•Javiera Barandiarán, Paola Araya et al.•Tapuya Latin American Science…•2025

  • Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not

    Michel Callon•Social Process of Scientific…•1980

  • States of Knowledge

    Sheila Jasanoff•States of Knowledge•2004

  • The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge

    Open Access•Michel Callon•Science Technology and Society•1999

  • The politics and policy of the Third Wave

    Harry Collins, Martin Weinel et al.•Critical Policy Studies•2010

  • Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff, Sheila S Jasanoff•Social Studies of Science•1987

  • The Third Wave of Science Studies

    Open Access•H M Collins, Harry Collins et al.•Social Studies of Science•2002

  • The Republic of science

    Open Access•Michael Polanyi•Minerva•1962

  • Virtual diversity

    Open Access•Harry Collins, R Evans et al.•Social Studies of Science•2024

  • Latour and the Question of Politics

    Open Access•B Laurent•Theory Culture & Society•2024

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae