Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Systemic barriers preventing farmer engagement in the agricultural climate transition

A Qualitative Study

Bibliographic Data

ID6454572
AuthorsJohn Whitton (0000-0001-6391-5740, University of Lancashire), Andy Carmichael (0000-0001-9540-2114, University of Lancashire)
Year2024
Volume20
Issue5
Pages1667-1680
Publication date2024-05-08
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSustainability Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1862-4057 • E-ISSN: 1862-4065
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s11625-024-01504-7
OpenAlexW4396739159
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited50

Farmers and the agricultural sector are facing an uncertain future, due to rapidly changing agricultural policy and a nexus of commercial, environmental and biodiversity challenges brought on by anthropogenic climate change. Balancing the interests of the farming community and natural environment is generating organisational and personal conflict, rather than effective agricultural adaption and a focus on the net zero transition. In this paper, we consider how farmers and the wider farming community can participate in engagement and decision-making for the transition, on their own terms, whilst ensuring social justice for fair and equitable decision-making. We discuss findings from our research project, that used questionnaires and follow up semi-structured interviews with farmers and farming groups to reveal systemic issues that prevent farmers engaging with the climate transition to net zero during their everyday practice. We highlight the structural relationships that form these barriers and frustrate farmers when designing and implementing farm interventions to agricultural systems during times of transition. Farmers have highlighted barriers to be associated with policy, (uncertain government strategy, landowner bias in government policy and tenancy restrictions, government bureaucracy—particularly environment schemes), commercial (market forces—downward pressure from supermarkets on price points, availability of labour due to seasonal migration restrictions, increasing cost of labour) and interpersonal (succession—uncertain future of the family farm due to limited income). This frustrates the ability of farmers to address climate change through farming practices and undermines the implementation of innovative engagement practices, such as co-produced interventions, in policy and decision-making settings

Agriculture · Biology · Business · Climate change · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Landscape ecology · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Sustainable development · Transition (genetics · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Climate change impacts on agriculture · Environmental Science · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Ecology

  • Religion, spirituality and faith of Swiss farmers in relation to biodiversity-linked farming behaviour

    Open Access•Ghezal Sabir, Robert Home et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2026

  • An Indicator Framework for Resilient Agroecosystems in Ontario, Canada

    Bryan Collins•The Professional Geographer•2025

  • Implementing the Farm-to-Fork Strategy

    Open Access•Sheila Holz, Denise Esteves•Social Sciences•2026

  • Farmer perceptions of the vulnerabilities of traditional livestock farming systems under global change

    Open Access•Zebensui Morales‐Reyes, Jomar M Barbosa et al.•AMBIO•2025

  • Agriculture (re)-territorialisation

    Open Access•N Loodts, Christine Frison et al.•Sustainability Science•2025

  • Why would a farmer pay more money to use something that’s not gonna give them anything back

    Open Access•Tatenda Mambo, Fred Nelson et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2025

  • Researching Social Life

    G N Gilbert•Researching Social Life•2008

  • Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Its Mitigation Strategies

    Open Access•Gurdeep Malhi, Manpreet Kaur et al.•Sustainability•2021

  • Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders

    Open Access•David J Pannell, Graham R Marshall et al.•Australian Journal of Experimental…•2006

  • Co-Producing Sustainability

    Open Access•Carina Wyborn, Amber Datta et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2019

  • Qualitative evaluation and research methods

    Open Access•David Ellis•International Journal of…•1990

  • Farmer goals and management styles

    Open Access•Sonja Brodt, Karen Klonsky et al.•Agricultural Systems•2006

  • Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research

    Leslie A Curry, Leslie Curry et al.•Circulation•2009

  • A theory of participation

    Open Access•Myer S Reed, Mark S Reed et al.•Restoration Ecology•2018

  • Thematic Analysis

    G Terry, Nikki Hayfield et al.•The Sage Handbook of Qualitative…•2017

  • Understanding Farmer Perspectives on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation

    Open Access•J G Arbuckle, Lois Wright Morton et al.•Environment and Behavior•2013

  • Co‐designing the environmental land management scheme in England

    Open Access•Paul Hurley, Jessica Lyon et al.•People and Nature•2022

  • Organising a Safe Space for Navigating Social-Ecological Transformations to Sustainability

    Open Access•Laura Pereira, Timothy Karpouzoglou et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • The politics of co-production

    Open Access•Esther Turnhout, Tamara Metze et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • Climate adaptation pathways for agriculture

    Open Access•N A Cradock-Henry, Paula Blackett et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • Science with society

    Open Access•Cara Steger, Julia A Klein et al.•Global Environmental Change•2021

  • Friend or foe? UK farmers' relationships with the weather

    Open Access•Rebecca Osborne, Nick Evans•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • The accidental environmentalists

    Open Access•Eric Joseph Marr, Peter Howley•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Uncovering obstacles

    Open Access•Shane Francis Conway, John Mcdonagh et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2017

  • Social sustainability in agriculture – A system-based framework

    Open Access•Judith Janker, Stefan Mann et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • How can academic research on UK agri-environment schemes pivot to meet the addition of climate mitigation aims

    Open Access•Jen Clements, Matt Lobley et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Investigating the impacts of climate change on ecosystem services in UK agro-ecosystems

    Open Access•Ellen Moss, Ellen D Moss et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Identifying economic and societal drivers of engagement in agri-environmental schemes for English dairy producers

    Open Access•Lucy Coyne, Helen Kendall et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Participation in Transition(s)

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers, Noel Longhurst•Journal of Environmental Policy &…•2016

  • Qualitative Data Analysis

    Open Access•Matthew B Miles, A Michael Huberman•Journal of Environmental Psychology•1994

  • A simplified approach to stakeholder engagement in natural resource management

    Open Access•Jared L Talley, Jen Schneider et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

Citations per year6
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae