The effect of natural resource rents on institutional quality in selected African countries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6455935 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meshesha Zewdie Amare (0000-0002-2516-9924), Wondaferahu Mulugeta Demissie (0009-0006-5087-6686), Mark S Massa |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 100506-100506 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainable Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2666-1888 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100506 |
| OpenAlex | W4408073219 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 42 |
The effect of natural resource rent on institutional quality remains debatable and thus needs further investigations. Using the World Bank's world development indicator and world governance indicator data for a panel of 43 selected African countries over the 1996–2022 period, this study investigated the effect of natural resource rents on institutional quality. To estimate the data, we used the Cross-Sectional Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lags (CS-ARD) model, the Dynamic Common Correlation Effects Mean Group (DCCE-MG) estimator for robustness check, the panel causality test, and the Dynamic Panel Threshold (DPT) estimation techniques. The CS-ARDL and DCCE-MG findings revealed that natural resource rents have an adverse and significant effect on institutional quality. The DPT estimation indicated that natural resource rents have a threshold parameter of 2.241 %. Positive effect of natural resource rents on institutional quality are observed when it is less than or equals to this threshold parameter; negative and significant effects were reported when natural resource rent is greater than the threshold parameter. The panel causality test result showed a bidirectional causal relationship between variables except the unidirectional causal relationship between trade openness and institutional quality. Thus, establishing strong intuitions, strengthening natural resource governance and management, improving accountability, promoting and upholding the rule of law, and involving the communities, particularly in decision-making processes related to the management, allocation, and distribution of natural resources, helps to reduce the adverse effects of natural resource rents on institutional quality
Business · Economic rent · Economics · Geography · Market economy · Natural (archaeology · Natural resource · Natural resource economics · Political science · Quality (philosophy · Resource (disambiguation · Computer Science · Economic Growth and Development · Mining and Resource Management · Natural Resources and Economic Development
Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model
Dynamic panels with threshold effect and endogeneity
Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors
Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation
The Varieties of Resource Experience
Inflation and growth
Addressing the Natural Resource Curse
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development
Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Testing slope homogeneity in large panels
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
A homogeneous approach to testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels
The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft
The Elusive Curse of Oil
Do Spillovers Matter When Estimating Private Returns to R&D
Natural Resources, Institutional Quality, and Economic Growth
Institutional Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in China
Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework
Cursing the Blessings? Natural Resource Abundance, Institutions, and Economic Growth
The Resource Curse and its Potential Reversal
Institutions and the Resource Curse
Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict
Resource rents, balance of power, and political stability
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |