Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Civil-military technology proximity and disclosure balance for the civilian Firm's Performance

A comparative study

Bibliographic Data

ID6456142
AuthorsTariq H Malik (0000-0001-6906-3622, Liaoning University), Yanmei Wang (0000-0003-1409-1604, Northeastern University, corresponding author), Yifan He (0000-0002-7856-5488, Northeastern University)
Year2025
Volume85
Pages103178-103178
Publication date2025-11-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnology in Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103178
OpenAlexW4416754570
LanguageEN
References cited33

This study examines the civil-military technology proximity-disclosure (PD) fit and its impact on the performance of civilian firms, with a comparative focus on China and the United States. In light of the growing global prominence of civil-military links, this research addresses the strategic tensions between technological proximity (access to military technologies) and technological disclosure (transparency to external stakeholders) in influencing firm outcomes. Leveraging data from 2,651 civilian firms across 82 countries, the analysis reveals distinct patterns between Chinese and American firms. Chinese firms, characterised by high proximity and lower disclosure, demonstrate superior performance when they maintain proximity to military technologies and increase their disclosure. Conversely, American firms perform better when they enhance proximity to military technologies while maintaining high disclosure levels. These findings suggest that national contexts significantly shape the optimal PD fit for firm performance, challenging universal approaches to civil-military collaboration in a single universal model. The study contributes to institutional theory by showing how different logics of conformance and legitimacy affect technological integration and firm outcomes in varied political and economic environments. One side of the logic and legitimacy is conformance to the military imperatives, and the other side is conformance to the market imperatives. Policymakers and firms can leverage these insights to craft context-specific strategies for navigating the complexities of civil-military alliances.

Balance (ability) · Balance sheet · China · Comparative case · Craft · Emerging markets · Legitimacy · Leverage (statistics) · Position (finance) · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Military and Defense Studies

  • Understanding corporate coherence

    Open Access•David J Teece, Richard Rumelt et al.•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•1994

  • Managing Legitimacy

    Mark C Suchman•Academy of Management Review•1995

  • Abstract and concrete differences in Chinese and American negotiation styles

    Yanmei Wang, Tariq H Malik•International Journal of Conflict…•2025

  • Cold War Armory

    Open Access•Thomas Heinrich•Enterprise & Society•2002

  • Military Modernization in Chinese Technical Progress and Industrial Innovation

    Nicholas M Trebat, Nicholas Trebat et al.•Review of Political Economy•2014

  • The defense innovation machine

    Open Access•Eugene Gholz, Harvey M Sapolsky•Journal of Strategic Studies•2021

  • A Revolution Too Far? US Defence Innovation, Europe and Nato’s Military-Technological Gap

    Daniel Fiott•Journal of Strategic Studies•2017

  • Technology, civil‐military relations, and warfare in the developing world

    Stephen Biddle, Robert Zirkle et al.•Journal of Strategic Studies•1996

  • Military Research and Development

    Open Access•Davis B Bobrow•The Annals of the American…•1973

  • Defense Conversion and Dual‐Use Technology

    Open Access•Linda Brandt•Policy Studies Journal•1994

  • Twice the Citizen

    Open Access•Risa Brooks, Grewal•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2022

  • Combining Institutional Theory and Population Ecology

    Lynne G Zucker•American Sociological Review•1989

  • The Iron Cage Revisited

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Why Military Technology Is Difficult to Restrain

    Open Access•Ted Greenwood•Science Technology & Human Values•1990

  • Civil Reconstructions of Military Technology

    Open Access•Tarja Cronberg•Journal of Peace Research•1994

  • The Elite Media and the Military-Civilian Culture Gap

    Open Access•Krista E Wiegand, David L Paletz•Armed Forces & Society•2001

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae