Pathways to remedy for corporate human rights abuse
A qualitative comparative analysis of the institutional design of the OECD national contact points
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6456934 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kari Otteburn (0000-0002-5938-7057, KU Leuven, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1410-1435 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Human Rights (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1364-2987 • E-ISSN: 1744-053X |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13642987.2025.2460185 |
| OpenAlex | W4407141022 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 32 |
Business · Human rights · Law and economics · Political science · Qualitative comparative analysis · Sociology · Corruption and Economic Development · Human Rights and Development · Law · Regulation and Compliance Studies
Redesigning Social Inquiry
SetMethods
Supranational grievance mechanisms and firm‐level employment relations
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R
QCA with R
The Comparative Method
United Nations Human Rights Council
Determining Criteria to Evaluate Outcomes of Businesses’ Provision of Remedy
OECD National Contact Points as Sites of Effective Remedy
Confronting Challenges to Substantive Remedy for Victims
Human Rights Impact Assessment of Business Activities
Assessing the Effectiveness of Non-State-Based Grievance Mechanisms in Providing Access to Remedy for Rightsholders
Analysing OECD National Contact Point Statements for Guidance on Human Rights Due Diligence
Discretion and the Gravity of Situations at the International Criminal Court
Reaching the limit
Applying new methodological tools in human rights research. The case of qualitative comparative analysis
Adapting social impact assessment to address a project's human rights impacts and risks
Redress and Corporate Human Rights Harms
Nonjudicial business regulation and community access to remedy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|