Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Secularism, Civil Religion, and the Religious Freedom of American Indians

Bibliographic Data

ID6704797
AuthorsVine Deloria (corresponding author), Jr Vine Deloria
Year1992
Volume16
Issue2
Pages9-20
Publication date1992-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Indian Culture and Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0161-6463 • E-ISSN: 0161-6463
PublisherUCLA American Indian Studies Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.17953/aicr.16.2.66u5620277528780
OpenAlexW321173368
LanguageEN
Citations received8

In 1978, Congress passed the American Indian Religious Freedom Resolution. At that time, most American Indians believed that the status of their right to practice their traditional religions was protected by that special legislation, even though in floor debate congressman Morris Udall had specifically stated that no major laws were being changed and no disruption of the existing state of affairs would take place. In the decade-and-a-half since then, Indian litigants have cited the religious freedom resolution as an indication on the part of Congress that it was federal policy, to be followed by all federal agencies, that the particular needs of traditional religious practitioners would be accommodated.\nIn 1988, the Supreme Court turned aside the Indians of northern California, refusing to prohibit the building of a minor logging road that would ruin the high country where they held vision quests and gathered medicines (Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Assn., 485 U. S. 439 [1988]). In the spring of 1990, the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Oregon did not have to present a compelling interest in order to pass legislation that would have the effect of virtually eliminating a religion, in this instance the use of peyote for religious ritual purposes (Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, -U. S.-, 108 L. Ed. 2d 876 [1990]). The consternation that has arisen among American Indians since these decisions is genuine, and many people feel betrayed by both the Congress and the Supreme Court

Citation · Download · Icon · Library science · Media studies · Political science · Secularism · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · History · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious Education and Schools · Religious studies

  • Savage Civil Religion

    Paul Christopher Johnson•Numen•2005

  • The New [Tele] Scope of Columbus

    Randel D Hanson•Canadian Review of American Studies•1994

  • Ancient DNA in anthropology

    Open Access•Frederika A Kaestle, K Ann Horsburgh•American Journal of Physical…•2002

  • Indian Common Law

    Robert D Cooter, Wolfgang Fikentscher•The American Journal of…•1998

  • Beyond Epistemic Provincialism

    Open Access•Cash Ahenakew, Vanessa De Oliveira Andreotti et al.•AlterNative An International…•2014

  • Beyond Idols

    Richard K Fenn•Beyond Idols•2001

  • Voicing the Bones

    Karen M Poremski, Karen M Poremski Karen M Poremski•Studies in American Indian…•2015

  • Spiritual Pilgrims at Mount Shasta, California

    Open Access•Lynn Huntsinger, María E Fernández-Giménez et al.•Geographical Review•2000

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,25
Citation span1994 - 2015 (22)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae