Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rethinking the Food-versus-Fuel Debate

An Appraisal of International Perspectives and Implications for the South African Industrial Biofuels Strategy

Bibliographic Data

ID6803758
AuthorsShaun Ruysenaar (corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume2
Issue1
Publication date2011-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2150-6779 • E-ISSN: 2150-6787
PublisherBerghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3167/ares.2011.020108
OpenAlexW2315922986
LanguageEN
References cited14

The global rush toward a biofueled future (and subsequent apprehension concerning unintended consequences) has met with powerful and wide-ranging critique. Bolstered by globally increasing food prices peaking in 2008, food insecurity has become a central concern when considering pursuing biofuels. Arguments in the wider literature propose a number of perspectives with which to evaluate the biofuels-food security nexus. In South Africa, however, the debate is largely configured around maize-for-ethanol and polarized between two antagonistic camps. A host of agricultural lobbies and industrial interests argue in support of biofuels while some politicians, civil society, and NGOs argue against it. Both groups draw their arguments from various domains of the food security discourse in support of their cause. This article considers the merits of these opposing arguments in relation to wider perspectives in the literature, in many cases highlighting non-holistic assumptions made by the opposing claimants. This article seeks to rekindle a waning dialogue and provide a more robust outline of the major concerns that need to be addressed when considering biofuels production from a food security perspective. Only then can South Africa expect to weigh up accurately the value of pursuing biofuels production

Agriculture · Apprehension · Biofuel · Economics · Food security · Political economy · Political science · Unintended consequences · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development · Energy and Environment Impacts · Engineering · Law · Biotechnology · Ecology

  • Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Needs for Food Security in 2030

    Open Access•David B Lobell, Meghan Burke et al.•Science•2008

  • Poverty and Famines

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Globalization and food security

    Open Access•E M Young•Progress in Development Studies•2003

  • Food Security in Developing Countries

    Open Access•Simon Maxwell•IDS Bulletin•1990

  • Peasants versus City-Dwellers

    Pradeep Mitra, Raaj Kumar Sah et al.•The Economic Journal•1994

  • Boundless Biofuels? Between Environmental Sustainability and Vulnerability

    Open Access•Arthur P J Mol•Sociologia Ruralis•2007

  • Agriculture and the State System

    Open Access•Harriet Friedma, Philip Mcmichael•Sociologia Ruralis•1989

  • The Political Economy of Food

    Harriet Friedmann•American Journal of Sociology•1982

  • Big Sugar in southern Africa

    Ben Richardson•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2010

  • The political ecology ofJatrophaplantations for biodiesel in Tamil Nadu, India

    P Ariza-Montobbio, Subhash Lele et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2010

  • Forests, food, and fuel in the tropics

    Peter Dauvergne, Kate J Neville•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2010

  • Agrofuels in the food regime

    Philip Mcmichael•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2010

  • Agrofuels capitalism

    Ben White, Anirban Dasgupta•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae