Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) G.P. Rightmire , Raymond WILLIAMS
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Binghamton University State University of New York
ANO 1992
TIPO Book
PERIÓDICO Evolutionary Anthropology
ISSN 1060-1538
E-ISSN 1520-6505
EDITORA Sage Publications (United States)
DOI 10.1002/evan.1360010204
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-14
MD5 37715add01f129c4f135842d6bb92932
MD5 05250D91EC7ABD1953E2EBE1D65FC329

Resumo

Controversies in paleoanthropology wax and wane, but substantial interest is currently focused on Homo erectus. This species has traditionally been regarded as a member in good standing of the human family, where it is placed as an evolutionary intermediate between earlier Homo habilis and later Homo sapiens. Recently, however, some workers have questioned whether the species exists at all. If its populations have been transformed slowly toward the modern condition, and if continuity with living people can be demonstrated in many geographic regions, then any separation of Homo erectus from Homo sapiens must be largely arbitrary. In that case, only one species should be recognized and this slowly changing lineage would have to be called Homo sapiens. Other paleontologists adopt a different view, arguing that Homo erectus is not only anatomically distinctive but also restricted in its geographic distribution. They claim that the fossils from Java and China are so specialized in appearance that they cannot lie in the mainstream of human evolution. Homo erectus, strictly defined as limited to the Far East, probably went extinct without issue. If so, more modern populations must have evolved from another source, perhaps one outside of Asia altogether.

Ferramentas