Politicians in white coats? Scientific advisory committees and policy in Britain

Bibliographic Data

ID6960903
AuthorsThe Lse Gv314 Group (corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume33
Issue4
Pages428-446
Publication date2018-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Policy and Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0952-0767 • E-ISSN: 1749-4192
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0952076717711746
OpenAlexW2623910913
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited13

Do scientists advising government in scientific advisory committees (SACs) in the UK fit the traditional model of offering substantive scientific advice to improve the quality of policy making, are they forums for policy making and negotiation where ‘the science’ is tempered by broader political concerns, or are they simply bodies that legitimise policies already decided upon? The traditional ‘on tap’ model and its alternatives imply differences in how the agendas of SACs are put together, how committees deliberate and how they influence policy, and these implied differences are explored on the basis of a 2015 survey covering the experiences and attitudes of 338 members from 46 scientific committees. The traditional model holds up rather well against models that see SACs filling broader political roles such as policy deliberation and legitimation. The findings suggest that the organization and procedures of SACs indeed allow scientists to offer advice largely without having to engage with or anticipate wider policy considerations and constraints, and that government ‘steering’ or otherwise leading SAC deliberations toward politically desired conclusions is rare

Deliberation · Legitimation · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · White paper · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Delphi Technique in Research · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access