Figurational Sociology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7076257 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katie Liston (0000-0003-3661-5202), Stephen Mennell (0000-0003-0207-5172) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Publication date | 2008-01-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | OTHER |
| Venue | The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosf081 |
| OpenAlex | W4243633393 |
| ISBN | 9781405165518 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
Figurational” sociology is the term used for the research tradition stemming from the work of Norbert Elias (1897–1990). The name comes from Elias's use of the grounding concept of “figuration” as a deliberate attempt to bypass and reformulate the speech and thought parameters of what he saw as homo clausus (“closed person”) assumptions underlying much of sociology. Figurational sociologists reject such common notions as agency–structure, action–structure, or “individual” and “society,” all of which imply that “the individual” is something separate and isolated from “society.” They think instead in terms of figurations or complex webs of interdependent relationships between people (homines aperti, or “open people”). These complex webs of interdependence are always in a state of flux, hence the alternative title of “process sociology” preferred by many researchers working within this tradition. Figurational dynamics can be seen in the longer and shorter term and might include state formation processes, civilizing and decivilizing processes, or the deamateurization of sport amongst many others
Action (physics · Agency (philosophy · Embodied cognition · Epistemology · Interdependence · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Structure and agency · Term (time · Philosophy · Sociology and Norbert Elias
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |