Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fans and Fan Culture

Bibliographic Data

ID7076933
AuthorsMatt Hills (0000-0002-8778-6530, corresponding author), Matthew Hills
Year2007
Publication date2007-02-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeOTHER
VenueThe Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (JOURNAL)
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosf025
OpenAlexW2989452831
ISBN9781405165518
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited12

Fans have become important to work in media sociology and cultural studies for a variety of reasons: they can be taken to represent a dedicated, active audience; they are consumers who are often also (unofficial, but sometimes official) media producers (Jenkins 1992; McKee 2002); and they can be analyzed as a significant part of contemporary consumer culture. Fandom – the state of being a fan – is usually linked to popular culture rather than high culture. People who appreciate high culture, often being as passionately partisan as pop culture's “fans,” are described as “connoisseurs” or “aficionados” rather than as fans (Jensen 1992). Whilst connoisseurship is typically deemed culturally legitimate, fandom has been analyzed as rather more problematic: the stereotype of “the fan” has been one of geeky, excessive, and unhealthy obsession with (supposedly) culturally trivial objects such as TV shows. Henry Jenkins has highlighted and opposed this negative fan stereotype, arguing that such portrayals of fandom should be critiqued, and that fans should instead be viewed more positively as building their own culture out of media products, and as selectively “poaching” meanings and interpretations from favored media texts. Jenkins, whose seminal work Textual Poachers (1992) helped to make fandom a viable object of academic study, suggests that the creativity of fans is downplayed in cultural common sense in favor of viewing fans as “cultural dupes” who are perfect consumers, always accepting what the culture industry produces for them. Against this narrative, depicted as belonging to the Frankfurt School of Marxist theorists such as Theodor Adorno as much as to forms of cultural common sense, Jenkins argues that fans discriminate keenly between and within their objects of fandom, developing an aesthetic sense of what counts as a “good” episode of television series such as Star Trek or Doctor Who (see Tulloch & Jenkins 1995

Advertising · Art · Escapism · Fandom · Literature · Marxist philosophy · Media culture · Media studies · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Popular culture · Sociology · Stereotype (UML · Cultural Studies · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Conceptualising Fan Persona

    Open Access•Kim Barbour, Mark Stewart•Persona Studies•2025

  • Language learners or hallyu fans? Identity and Korean language learning in the digital wilds

    Nate Ming Curran•Journal of Language Identity &…•2024

  • A ‘third way’ for football fandom research

    Kevin Dixon•Soccer and Society•2011

  • Surf’s up!’

    Tom Gibbons, Kevin Dixon•Soccer and Society•2010

  • Club cultures

    Sarah Thornton•Club cultures•1996

  • Audiences

    Nicholas Abercrombie, Brian Longhurst•Audiences•1998

  • Using the Force

    Will Brooker•Using the Force•2002

  • Tune in, Log on

    Nancy K Baym, Nancy Baym•Tune in, log on•2000

  • Consuming Sport

    G Crawford•Consuming Sport•2004

  • Popular culture fandoms, the boundaries of religious studies, and the project of the self

    Sean Mccloud•Culture and Religion•2003

  • Fan Cultures

    Matt Hills, Matthew Hills•Fan Cultures•2003

  • Fanning the Flames

    William W Kelly, William Kelly•Fanning the Flames: Fans and…•2004

  • The Adoring Audience

    Lisa A Lewis•The Adoring Audience•2002

  • Star Trek Fans and Costume Art

    Open Access•H Jenkins, Heather Joseph-Witham et al.•Western Folklore•1997

  • Soap Fans

    Rebecca G Adams, C Lee Harrington et al.•Social Forces•1996

  • Media meta-capital

    Open Access•N Couldry•Theory and Society•2003

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2010 - 2025 (16)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-HubLibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae