Modernity is a Qualitative, Not a Chronological Category

Bibliographic Data

ID7093601
AuthorsPeter Osborne (0000-0002-1615-2872, corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume1
Issue192
Pages65-84
Publication date1992-03-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew left review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0028-6060 • E-ISSN: 2044-0480
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.64590/yn7
OpenAlexW1873907936
LanguageEN
Citations received22

Few thickets are more tangled than that in which the idea of modernity has become enmeshed, few topics less likely to inspire confidence than the question of its relations to the ‘postmodern’. Not least of the problems concerns the character and status of the concept of modernity itself. For it is far from clear that the main figures in recent debates have been writing about, and disputing, the same set of issues when the term has been used. This is of course, in one sense, precisely the point: it is the meaning of ‘modernity’ that is in dispute, and the argument is hardly just terminological. Nonetheless, there remains considerable scope for reflection about what kind of concept ‘modernity’ is, and in particular for a more systematic consideration of the relations between its various uses. What follows is offered as a preliminary contribution to this task

Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis · Character (mathematics · Epistemology · Meaning (existential · Modernity · Postmodernism · Relation (database · Sociology · Term (time · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Mathematics · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOI