How to criticize? On Honneth’s method
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7093722 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mikael Carleheden (0000-0002-7624-5915, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 299-318 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Distinktion Journal of Social Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1600-910X • E-ISSN: 2159-9149 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1600910x.2020.1779100 |
| OpenAlex | W3038155671 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 52 |
This article investigates the meaning and role of social critique in the social sciences. This form of theorizing has always been a significant part of the social sciences. Due to the scientific ideal of value neutrality, however, the manner in which social criticism is conducted is seldom discussed. I claim that the value-neutrality ideal rests on a conception of normative subjectivism that can be challenged by turning to some notion of practical reason. However, there is no need to turn to any strong notion of reason; instead, I use the term ‘normative reasoning’. The main question posed in the article then becomes: What is it that we do when we reason in a normative manner in the social sciences? The first part of the article addresses Axel Honneth’s ‘Grand Social Theory of Modernity’ in Freedom’s Right. His procedure in the book is treated as a significant case of normative reasoning. I investigate his method of ‘reconstruction’ by comparing it primarily to the methods of ‘construction’ and ‘genealogy’. The second part of the article is a critical discussion of Honneth’s method of normative reasoning. My main criticism is that, despite his intentions, his procedure is overly constructivist in the sense that it prevents a disclosure of ongoing transformations of ethical life. In the conclusion, I argue for a pluralistic methodology; different ways of normative reasoning should be used to solve different kinds of normative problems
Epistemology · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Postmodernism in Literature and Education · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
The Return of grand theory in the human sciences
An essay on the history of civil society, 1767
Abductive Analysis
Freedom's Right
Atomism
Four essays on liberty
Communication and the Evolution of Society
The Structure of Social Action
The Art of Social Theory
Beyond Communication. A Critical Study of Axel Honneth's Social Philosophy
Social Theory
Contemporary Critical Theory and Methodology
Modernization and Postmodernization
Pathologies of Reason
Individualization
Grammatology of modern recognition orders
Brutalization of the social conflict
Misdevelopments, Pathologies, and Normative Revolutions
The New Spirit of Capitalism
Anthropology and normativity
Reconstructivism
Habermas' Method
Power and critique
Method in Social Science
The Transformation of Our Conduct of Life
The philosophical discourse of modernity
The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self
Social Freedom and the Demands of Justice
From Critical Social Theory to a Social Theory of Critique
Dissolutions of the Social
Between normativism and naturalism
Rational Reconstruction as a Method of Political Theory between Social Critique and Empirical Political Science
The Possibility of a Disclosing Critique of Society
Understanding Genealogy
The first formulation of sociology
On Critique
Theorizing the Good Society
Theoretical Logic in Sociology
The ideal of freedom in the Anthropocene
Towards a Critical Sociology
Afterword
The Meaning of 'Theory
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |