The Importance of Being Earnest
Satire and the Criticism of Law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7095337 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Goodrich (0000-0001-8013-5850, Institute for Legal Studies, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 43-58 |
| Publication date | 2005-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Semiotics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1035-0330 • E-ISSN: 1470-1219 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10350330500059122 |
| OpenAlex | W2039371210 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 7 |
Even Coke joked. His humour, however, has not been taken up by commentators. Even less so his satirical allusions. It is but one instance of the way in which the humorous genre of satire has been almost completely ignored by jurists. They find it threatening, they don't know what to do with it, and it infracts antique norms of ecclesiastical dogma that common law has yet to properly examine. This article elicits the historical and theoretical reasons for the doctrinal repression of the satirical. It sets about the lengthy task of remedying the exclusion of satire from legal analysis
Art · Criticism · Literary criticism · Literature · Political science · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal principles and applications · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2022 (17) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |