Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public Sphere Alienation

A Model for Analysis and Critique

Bibliographic Data

ID7097830
AuthorsKatherine R Knobloch (corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume18
Issue4
Pages21-37
Publication date2011-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJavnost - The Public (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1318-3222 • E-ISSN: 1854-8377
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13183222.2011.11009065
OpenAlexW2091121059
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited24

This paper reintroduces the theory of political alienation as a model for analysing and critiquing public sphere structures, arguing that commodified and professionalised media and organisational structures distance the general public from the production of public opinion and limit the public's capacity to use communication for democratic empowerment. These communication norms and practices act as a counter-force to more deliberative forms of communication and (re)create five conditions of alienation – commodification, social isolation, meaninglessness, normlessness, and powerlessness – that influence what individuals know, how they interact, and who ultimately has power in the political process. Integrating literature on public opinion, deliberative democracy, mediated communication, and collective action, this paper offers an anti-normative lens for critiquing currently existing practices and understanding how contemporary communication structures operate systemically

Alienation · Political science · Politics · Public sphere · Sociology · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

  • Who Talks and Who Listens? How Political Involvement Influences the Potential for Democratic Deliberation in Everyday Political Talk

    Open Access•Lea Gärtner, Alexander Wuttke et al.•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2021

  • Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices

    Open Access•Justin Reedy, Raymond Orr et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2020

  • The representation of public opinion in reporting poll results on environment issues

    Open Access•Kentaro Nagai•Frontiers in Communication•2023

  • Collective Identity and Voice at the Australian Citizens’ Parliament

    Open Access•Andrea Felicetti, John Gastil et al.•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2012

  • Political Socialization of International Students

    Mizuki H Wyant, Elizabeth H Hurst et al.•Journal of Intercultural…•2020

  • News Media, Knowledge, and Political Interest

    Open Access•Sophie Lecheler, Claes H De Vreese•Journal of Communication•2017

  • The internal dynamics of “scaling up” deliberative mini-publics

    Open Access•John Rountree, Chris Anderson et al.•Communication and the Public•2022

  • The “Solo of Deliberator”

    Open Access•Tianru Guan, Xiaotong Chen•Social Media + Society•2026

  • Do Voters Trust Deliberative Minipublics? Examining the Origins and Impact of Legitimacy Perceptions for the Citizens’ Initiative Review

    Open Access•Kristinn Már, John Gastil•Political Behavior•2021

  • From the Secret Ballot to the Public Vote

    Justin Reedy, John Gastil et al.•Political Communication•2015

  • Civic (Re)socialisation

    Open Access•Katherine R Knobloch, John Gastil•Politics•2015

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • By Popular Demand

    John Gastil•By Popular Demand•2000

  • The Internet and Democratic Citizenship

    Open Access•Stephen Coleman, Jay G Blumler•Internet and Democratic Citizenship•2009

  • The Myth of Digital Democracy

    Matthew Hindman•Myth of Digital Democracy•2009

  • The Rights Revolution

    Charles R Epp•Rights Revolution•1998

  • Bowling alone

    Open Access•Robert D Putnam•Proceedings of the 2000 ACM…•2000

  • Political Communication and Deliberation

    John Gastil•Political Communication and…•2008

  • Democratic Phoenix

    Open Access•P Norris•Democratic Phoenix•2002

  • A New Engagement

    Cliff Zukin, Scott Keeter et al.•A new engagement?•2006

  • Les sondages et la transformation de l'opinion publique

    Benjamin Ginsberg•Hermès•2001

  • Projections of Power

    Robert M Entman•Projections of Power•2003

  • New media campaigns and the managed citizen

    Philip N Howard•New media campaigns and the…•2006

  • Information and American Democracy

    Bruce Bimber, Bruce Allen Bimber•INFORMATION AND AMERICAN…•2003

  • A Virtuous Circle

    Pippa Norris•A Virtuous Circle•2000

  • Democracy without citizens

    Robert M Entman•Democracy without citizens•1989

  • Making a Fragile Public

    Nina Eliasoph•Sociological Theory•1996

Citations per year0.79
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae