Development as Dignity
Dissensus, Equality and Contentious Politics in Bihar, India
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7098086 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Indrajit Roy (0000-0002-1583-6244, University of Oxford, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 517-536 |
| Publication date | 2013-10-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Oxford Development Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-0818 • E-ISSN: 1469-9966 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13600818.2013.835392 |
| OpenAlex | W1992487471 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 10 |
This paper makes an analytical case for the understanding of development as a process that enables people to reclaim their dignity and interrogate inegalitarian social relations. It is motivated by the ongoing debate within development studies between those who propound a teleological view of development and those who adopt the opposing view that the process must not obliterate historical and cultural difference. The former view is informed by an assumption that the human condition can and should be improved, and the trajectory of such improvement is predetermined and predictable. The latter view is ambivalent, not only about the possibility of improvement, but also about its desirability. Against this dichotomy, this paper urges scholars of development to consider that people might envisage that the social inequalities they experience could be reduced, irrespective of "improvement". The ethnography on which the paper draws cover show the way in which a group of agricultural labourer households stigmatised as "untouchable" - and alleged to be illegally squatting on public property-stand their ground violent opposition by local elites. While servility to and quiescence with elite opinion would allow them to "improve" their lives by relocating to a less contentious space, community members assert their ethical claims on the disputed property without flinching. They do this not because they like to live in squalid conditions, but because complying with elite diktats is an affront to their dignity
Ambivalence · Dignity · Elite · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Property (philosophy · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Critical Theory and Political Philosophy · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Law · Social Psychology
Examining microcredit self-help groups through the lens of feminist dignity
“Delivering” energy democracy in rural India? A case study of the “community-based” solar off-grid
First steps toward building respectful development
Identity, dignity and development as trajectory
Dignified development
Identity, dignity and development as trajectory
Women’s Collectives and State-Led Development in West Bengal
The Rise and Fall of Agrarian Populism in Post-colonial India
Reserve labor, unreserved politics
Can Grassroots Mobilization of the Poorest Reduce Corruption? A Tale of Governance Reforms and Struggle against Petty Corruption in Bihar, India
Utopia in Crisis? Subaltern Imaginations in Contemporary Bihar
The politics of hopeful citizenship
Emancipation as social equality
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,08 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |