Weber Reading Stammler
What Horizons for the Sociology of Law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7098735 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michel Coutu (0000-0002-1833-7926, Université de Montréal, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 356-374 |
| Publication date | 2013-08-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Law and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0263-323X • E-ISSN: 1467-6478 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00630.x |
| OpenAlex | W2012185585 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
This article asks whether the two studies by Max Weber that form his Critique of Stammler are by now only marginal to a study of Weber's work, of historical interest only, given that Rudolf Stammler has long since been relegated to almost complete obscurity. Or could they still lead to a better understanding of the thought of Max Weber? This article argues that the Critique of Stammler offers a still‐relevant contribution to sociological reflection, particularly about law, and valuable guidance for distinguishing normative legal orders from empirical ones, and measuring the causal influence of the former on the latter
Economics · Epistemology · Normative · Political science · Positive economics · Reading (process · Social science · Sociology · Sociology of law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Philosophy · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |