How Do You Know You’ve Alternated
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7102775 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harry Collins (0000-0003-2909-9035, KES, Cardiff School of Social Science, Cardiff University, The Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3WT, UK; fax: +44 29 20 874175, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 103-106 |
| Publication date | 2004-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Studies of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0306312704041342 |
| OpenAlex | W2062286793 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 3 |
Until I read Stolzenberg’s (2004: 82) review, I had not realised I had really misread Bricmont and Sokal’s argument: I thought they were just ‘nitpicking’. I’m still not so sure, but I’ll leave that to readers of the book. I’ll concentrate on the more substantive question of ‘alternation’ discussed in his last paragraph. Stolzenberg (2004: 86) points out that he has been told that good sociologists acquire the skill of alternating between world views during their training but that he is suspicious
Epistemology · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.23 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2004 - 2014 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |