Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences
A Case for Methodological Pluralism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7103148 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul A Roth (0000-0002-9531-4365, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Publication date | 1989-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cornell University Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.7591/9781501746215 |
| OpenAlex | W4229607917 |
| ISBN | 9781501746215 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
Paul A Roth's book examines an important controversy in the philosophy of the social sciences that has developed since the demise of logical positivism and its conception of rationality. Roth contends that this controversy-a dispute over the canons of rationality-is the product of the mistaken belief in methodological exclusivism. Drawing on work in contemporary epistemology by W. V. O. Quine, Richard Rorty, and Paul Feyerabend, he argues that no single theory of human behavior has methodological priority; indeed, the existence of a plethora of theories for the study of human behavior, he believes, is an inevitable consequence of our epistemic situation
Epistemology · Meaning (existential · Pluralism (philosophy · Social science · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Management and Organizational Studies · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Psychology
Jarvie’s Rationalitätstreit
Wary Reasoning
Indeterminacy, empirical evidence, and methodological pluralism
Corruption, method choice, and constraints—exploring methodological pluralism in corruption research
The Philosophical Structure of Historical Explanation
Interpretive inquiry
Feminist comparative policy
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 1991 - 2019 (29) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |