C. Wright Mills’ The Sociological Imagination and the Construction of Talcott Parsons as a Conservative Grand Theorist
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7105170 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helmut Staubmann (0000-0002-4955-9089, Universität Innsbruck, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 178-193 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-10 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The American Sociologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-1232 • E-ISSN: 1936-4784 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12108-020-09463-z |
| OpenAlex | W3092455742 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 20 |
C. Wright Mills was one of the most important critics of Talcott Parsons who succeeded in establishing the image of Parsons as a conservative “grand theorist” out of touch with the real world and its real problems, as passed on in sociological textbooks. In this essay, it is argued that Mills’ “translation of Parsons into English” is a one-sided interpretation based on his own theoretical premises, which he called the sociological imagination. The way Mills conceptualized sociological imagination leans towards an ideological world-view with political ambitions but lacks the necessary theoretical differentiation for an adequate evaluation of Parsons’ general theory of action and the conceptualization of the social system in particular. Given Mills’ premises, it appeared to him as if Parsons could not deal with social conflict, social change, domination and power relationships, which laid the foundations of a narrative quite distinct from the “real” Parsons. The conceptual deficiencies of Mills’ sociological imagination lead into theoretical antinomies and the practical inability to resolve political issues outside of forceful intervention as suggested in the theoretical tradition of Thomas Hobbes. Independent of a political positioning, Parsons’ sophistications in his understanding of power as one of several generalized symbolic media of interaction beyond the Hobbesian utilitarian model are necessary to come to terms with the increased complexity of modern society, both in theoretical and in political terms
Action (physics · Conceptualization · Epistemology · Ideology · Interpretation (philosophy · Politics · Power (physics · Social science · Sociological theory · Sociology · Wright · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Law · Philosophy · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Talcott Parsons, Zur Theorie der sozialen Interaktionsmedien, herausgegeben von Helmut Staubacher und Paul Reichacher. Wiesbaden
The Function of Saniri as a Means of Controlling Village Development
A hubristic windmill off Harvard Yard
Uncritical sociology
Lost & Forgotten
A ‘Yankee Savage in Radical Clothing’
Social systems and the evolution of action theory
C. Wright Mills and the Cuban Revolution
Character and Social Structure
Structure of Social Action
The American University
C. Wright Mills Through his Letters – His Time in Innsbruck and the Making of The Sociological Imagination
The Rules of Sociological Method
Discovering culture” in interaction
The Causes of World War III
Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung
The Sociological Imagination
Talcott Parsons
"Capitalism" In Recent German Literature
Addressing Parsons in Sociological Textbooks
The state of American Sociology
The sociological imagination
The Distribution of Power in American Society
The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology
| Citations per year | 1.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |