Family carers’ experiences of care home visiting restrictions during the Covid-19 pandemic
A Relational Autonomy Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7146355 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Josie Dixon (0000-0003-4772-6450, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author), Edmund Stubbs (0000-0003-1464-8361, London School of Economics and Political Science) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 987-1015 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ageing and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-686X • E-ISSN: 1469-1779 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0144686x24000059 |
| OpenAlex | W4392234466 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 55 |
Care home residents were vulnerable to severe effects from Covid-19 infection and experienced high mortality, especially early in the pandemic. In response, many countries introduced visiting restrictions to limit transmission. These often proved extensive and prolonged, drawing fresh attention to issues of autonomy and human rights in long-term care. We conducted in-depth interviews with 27 family carers in England with relatives living in a care home during the pandemic. Adopting a relational autonomy lens, conceptualised using the capability approach, we examined how family carers considered their relatives’ capabilities to have been impacted by visiting restrictions and how relational support could be strengthened. Family carers were concerned for their relative’s fundamental capabilities, including physical health, emotional well-being, and feeling connected to significant others. Capability deprivations were associated with family separation, ‘adapted’ visits that were inappropriate for their relative’s needs, and lack of opportunity for family carers’ to provide emotional support, help staff identify their relative’s emotional and physical needs, monitor care standards or advocate for their relative. Optimising relational support during a public health emergency requires effective collaboration between care homes and family carers. Specific measures include (1) ensuring there is clarity, a sense of shared purpose, clear accountability and confidence in visiting restrictions, (2) providing family carers regular, personalised updates about their relative using a range of digital communication tools, (3) allowing choice about visiting arrangements where possible, and ensuring visits are appropriate for residents with dementia and (4) ensuring that family carers feel welcomed, involved and enabled to resume in-person visits at the earliest opportunity. Consultation with care homes, families and residents, and workforce and digital readiness should be prioritised
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Autonomy · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Disease · Pandemic · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Sociology · Family Support in Illness · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Medicine · Psychology · Virology
Autonomy in Long Term Care
Informational bases of alternative welfare approaches
Supporting Patient Autonomy
What Is the Point of Equality?
Three Dimensions of Autonomy
Relational autonomy
Relational ethical approaches to the Covid-19 pandemic
Isolating residents including wandering residents in care and group homes
Reassessing Autonomy in Long-Term Care
Issues in the Measurement of Poverty
The Experience of Covid-19 Visitor Restrictions among Families of People Living in Long-Term Residential Care Facilities during the First Wave of the Pandemic in Ireland
Quality of life in a broader perspective
Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews
Facilitators and barriers to autonomy
Human rights and care homes for older people
Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements
Let me touch him”
The Capability Approach
Between an Ethic of Care and an Ethic of Autonomy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |