Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Family carers’ experiences of care home visiting restrictions during the Covid-19 pandemic

A Relational Autonomy Perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID7146355
AuthorsJosie Dixon (0000-0003-4772-6450, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author), Edmund Stubbs (0000-0003-1464-8361, London School of Economics and Political Science)
Year2025
Volume45
Issue5
Pages987-1015
Publication date2025-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgeing and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-686X • E-ISSN: 1469-1779
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0144686x24000059
OpenAlexW4392234466
LanguageEN
References cited55

Care home residents were vulnerable to severe effects from Covid-19 infection and experienced high mortality, especially early in the pandemic. In response, many countries introduced visiting restrictions to limit transmission. These often proved extensive and prolonged, drawing fresh attention to issues of autonomy and human rights in long-term care. We conducted in-depth interviews with 27 family carers in England with relatives living in a care home during the pandemic. Adopting a relational autonomy lens, conceptualised using the capability approach, we examined how family carers considered their relatives’ capabilities to have been impacted by visiting restrictions and how relational support could be strengthened. Family carers were concerned for their relative’s fundamental capabilities, including physical health, emotional well-being, and feeling connected to significant others. Capability deprivations were associated with family separation, ‘adapted’ visits that were inappropriate for their relative’s needs, and lack of opportunity for family carers’ to provide emotional support, help staff identify their relative’s emotional and physical needs, monitor care standards or advocate for their relative. Optimising relational support during a public health emergency requires effective collaboration between care homes and family carers. Specific measures include (1) ensuring there is clarity, a sense of shared purpose, clear accountability and confidence in visiting restrictions, (2) providing family carers regular, personalised updates about their relative using a range of digital communication tools, (3) allowing choice about visiting arrangements where possible, and ensuring visits are appropriate for residents with dementia and (4) ensuring that family carers feel welcomed, involved and enabled to resume in-person visits at the earliest opportunity. Consultation with care homes, families and residents, and workforce and digital readiness should be prioritised

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Autonomy · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Disease · Pandemic · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Sociology · Family Support in Illness · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Medicine · Psychology · Virology

  • Autonomy in Long Term Care

    Bart Collopy, Bart J Collopy•The Gerontologist•1988

  • Informational bases of alternative welfare approaches

    Open Access•Amartya Sen•Journal of Public Economics•1974

  • Supporting Patient Autonomy

    Open Access•Vikki Entwistle, Vikki A Entwistle et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2010

  • What Is the Point of Equality?

    Elizabeth S Anderson, Liz Anderson•Ethics•1999

  • Three Dimensions of Autonomy

    Catriona Mackenzie•Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender•2014

  • Relational autonomy

    Open Access•Carlos Gómez-Vírseda, Rafael Amo Usanos•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2021

  • Relational ethical approaches to the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•DAVID JEFFREY, David Ian Jeffrey•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • Isolating residents including wandering residents in care and group homes

    Open Access•Kathleen Liddell, Alex Ruck Keene et al.•International Journal of Law and…•2021

  • Reassessing Autonomy in Long-Term Care

    George J Agich•The Hastings Center Report•1990

  • Issues in the Measurement of Poverty

    Amartya Sen•Scandinavian Journal of Economics•1979

  • The Experience of Covid-19 Visitor Restrictions among Families of People Living in Long-Term Residential Care Facilities during the First Wave of the Pandemic in Ireland

    Open Access•Nicola Cornally, Caroline Kilty et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Quality of life in a broader perspective

    Open Access•Miriam S van Loon, Karen M van Leeuwen et al.•Quality of Life Research•2017

  • Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews

    Open Access•Sara Thunberg, Linda Arnell•International Journal of Social…•2022

  • Facilitators and barriers to autonomy

    Open Access•Jolande van Loon, Katrien Luijkx et al.•Ageing and Society•2019

  • Human rights and care homes for older people

    Open Access•CAROLINE EMMER DE ALBUQUERQUE GREEN, Anthea Tinker et al.•The International Journal of…•2021

  • Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements

    Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Feminist Economics•2003

  • Let me touch him”

    Open Access•Pnina Dolberg, Sagit Lev et al.•Journal of Aging Studies•2023

  • The Capability Approach

    I Robeyns•Journal of Human Development•2005

  • Between an Ethic of Care and an Ethic of Autonomy

    Laura Davy•Angelaki•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae