Isolating delayed attentional disengagement from biased orienting to signals of threat in anxiety – not there yet
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7149866 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Poppy Watson (0000-0001-7454-413X, Psychology, University of Technology Sydney, corresponding author), Daniel Pearson (0000-0001-6646-7461, The University of Sydney), Mike E Le Pelley (0000-0002-5145-5502, UNSW Sydney) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1875-1900 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognition & Emotion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-9931 • E-ISSN: 1464-0600 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02699931.2025.2459847 |
| PMID | 39918549 |
| OpenAlex | W4407253416 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 147 |
(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.638054] critiqued this literature, pointing out that most studies used paradigms that could not isolate attentional disengagement from attentional orienting. Since this critique, over fifty studies claiming to measure attentional disengagement from threat in anxiety have been published, many using suboptimal methods. In this (preregistered) systematic review and meta-analysis, we outline why many of these paradigms fail to provide a valid measure of attentional disengagement from stimuli with different emotional content. We also highlight studies where the paradigms and task parameters allowed for the valid measurement of attentional disengagement and include a meta-analysis (759 participants) of this subset. Some evidence was observed for slowed disengagement from threat images (relative to neutral) in high-anxious individuals, but heterogeneity across studies was high, and the effect disappeared when restricting the analysis to paradigms that could rule out behavioural freezing as an alternative explanation. Overall, these findings highlight the need for better-quality research in this area and suggest best practices for the field moving forward
Anxiety · Attentional bias · Cognitive psychology · Disengagement theory · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health Research Topics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology
Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm
Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?
A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia
Attentional bias for threat
Saccade target selection and object recognition
A Brief Version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale
Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders
Social Phobia
A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety
Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century
The Attention System of the Human Brain
Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders
What is Motivational Interviewing?
How to perform a meta-analysis with R
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
Global prevalence of anxiety disorders
Inhibition of return
Cognitive Approaches to Emotion and Emotional Disorders
Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Impaired disengagement of attention from computer-related stimuli in Internet Gaming Disorder
Methods to split cognitive task data for estimating split-half reliability
Trait mindfulness is related to attention bias toward threat and attention bias variability in social anxiety disorder
Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward
Does temperament have a differential effect on Inhibition of Return (IOR)
You do it to yourself
Time-course of attention to negative stimuli
Rapid attentional biases to threat-associated visual features
There’s more to anxiety than meets the eye
The reliability paradox
Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli
Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |