The closer you are, the more it hurts
The Impact of Proximity on Moral Decision-Making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7149870 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Federica Alfeo (0000-0002-0306-2122, University of Bari Aldo Moro, corresponding author), Antonietta Curci (0000-0002-0932-7152, University of Bari Aldo Moro), Tiziana Lanciano (0000-0001-6533-1052, University of Bari Aldo Moro) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 119-139 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognition & Emotion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-9931 • E-ISSN: 1464-0600 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02699931.2025.2484358 |
| PMID | 40153572 |
| OpenAlex | W4408961164 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 50 |
Moral dilemmas arise when individuals must navigate conflicts between competing moral principles. Sacrificial dilemmas are widely used to examine factors influencing decision-making (DM). This study explored how proximity affects moral DM using computer-based interactive videos depicting variations of the Footbridge Dilemma, aiming to clarify how contextual factors shape moral evaluations. In Study 1, scenarios required varying levels of physical proximity between the decision-maker and the victim, mirroring real-world behavioural patterns. Participants' choices (utilitarian vs. deontological), response times (RTs), and emotional responses (factual and counterfactual) were analysed. Study 2 controlled for action type while manipulating only the visual representation of distance, allowing for an isolated examination of perceived proximity's impact. The findings suggest that significant differences in physical perceived distance influence moral choices, whereas minor variations do not meaningfully affect decisions. Counterfactual emotions emerged as key drivers of moral judgment, shaping participants' responses to dilemmas. Future research should extend these findings to non-hypothetical contexts. The implications span clinical practice, legal systems, and artificial intelligence, offering insights for both theoretical advancements and practical applications
Cognitive psychology · Ethics in Business and Education · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Psychology
Killing for the greater good
Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions
Keeping One's Distance
How to build a baby
The Trolley Problem
On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies
Pushing moral buttons
Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment
G*Power 3
Temporal construal.
Clarifying Gender Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments
Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science
Social Distance during the Covid-19 Pandemic Reflects Perceived Rather Than Actual Risk
Simulating murder
Different Attentional Patterns for Regret and Disappointment
Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making
Cultural variation in the role of responsibility in regret and disappointment
Regret Theory
Drones, risk, and moral injury
Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample
Situation models in language comprehension and memory
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |