Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The closer you are, the more it hurts

The Impact of Proximity on Moral Decision-Making

Bibliographic Data

ID7149870
AuthorsFederica Alfeo (0000-0002-0306-2122, University of Bari Aldo Moro, corresponding author), Antonietta Curci (0000-0002-0932-7152, University of Bari Aldo Moro), Tiziana Lanciano (0000-0001-6533-1052, University of Bari Aldo Moro)
Year2026
Volume40
Issue1
Pages119-139
Publication date2026-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognition & Emotion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-9931 • E-ISSN: 1464-0600
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02699931.2025.2484358
PMID40153572
OpenAlexW4408961164
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited50

Moral dilemmas arise when individuals must navigate conflicts between competing moral principles. Sacrificial dilemmas are widely used to examine factors influencing decision-making (DM). This study explored how proximity affects moral DM using computer-based interactive videos depicting variations of the Footbridge Dilemma, aiming to clarify how contextual factors shape moral evaluations. In Study 1, scenarios required varying levels of physical proximity between the decision-maker and the victim, mirroring real-world behavioural patterns. Participants' choices (utilitarian vs. deontological), response times (RTs), and emotional responses (factual and counterfactual) were analysed. Study 2 controlled for action type while manipulating only the visual representation of distance, allowing for an isolated examination of perceived proximity's impact. The findings suggest that significant differences in physical perceived distance influence moral choices, whereas minor variations do not meaningfully affect decisions. Counterfactual emotions emerged as key drivers of moral judgment, shaping participants' responses to dilemmas. Future research should extend these findings to non-hypothetical contexts. The implications span clinical practice, legal systems, and artificial intelligence, offering insights for both theoretical advancements and practical applications

Cognitive psychology · Ethics in Business and Education · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Psychology

  • The Role of Trait Empathy in Moral Decision Making

    Federica Alfeo, Pasquale Zappimpulso et al.•The American Journal of Psychology•2025

  • Moral Decision‐Making Under Ego Depletion in Virtual Reality

    Open Access•Yanglei Cao, Yatong Liu et al.•International Journal of Psychology•2026

  • Killing for the greater good

    Open Access•Melissa M Mcdonald, Andrew M Defever et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2017

  • Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions

    Open Access•Marcel Zeelenberg, Wilco W Van Dijk et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1998

  • Keeping One's Distance

    Open Access•Lawrence E Williams, John A Bargh•Psychological Science•2008

  • How to build a baby

    Jean M Mandler•Psychological Review•1992

  • The Trolley Problem

    Judith Jarvis Thomson•The Yale Law Journal•1985

  • On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies

    Marcel Zeelenberg, Wilco W Van Dijk et al.•Cognition & Emotion•2000

  • Pushing moral buttons

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Cognition•2009

  • Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making

    Open Access•Julia F Christensen, Antoni Gomila•Neuroscience & Biobehavioral…•2012

  • The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman, L Young et al.•Psychological Science•2006

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • Temporal construal.

    Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman•Psychological Review•2003

  • Clarifying Gender Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments

    Open Access•Joel Armstrong, Rebecca Friesdorf et al.•Social Psychological and…•2019

  • Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science

    Kurt Lewin•Resolving social conflicts•1997

  • Social Distance during the Covid-19 Pandemic Reflects Perceived Rather Than Actual Risk

    Open Access•Tina Iachini, Francesca Frassinetti et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Simulating murder

    Fiery Cushman, Kurt Gray et al.•Emotion•2011

  • Different Attentional Patterns for Regret and Disappointment

    Open Access•Nadège Bault, Pierre Wydoodt et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2016

  • Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making

    Open Access•Marcel Zeelenberg•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1999

  • Cultural variation in the role of responsibility in regret and disappointment

    Open Access•Cinzia Giorgetta, Marcel Zeelenberg et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2012

  • Regret Theory

    Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden•The Economic Journal•1982

  • Drones, risk, and moral injury

    Christian Enemark•Critical Military Studies•2019

  • Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample

    Open Access•Bence Bago, Márton Kovács et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • Situation models in language comprehension and memory

    Rolf A Zwaan, Gabriel A Radvansky•Psychological Bulletin•1998

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae