A behavioural test of depression-related probability bias
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7149949 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert W Booth (0000-0001-7614-4519, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey, corresponding author), Selen Gönül (0000-0001-8549-5740, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey), B Deniz Sözügür (Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey), Khadija Khalid (Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 963-977 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognition & Emotion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-9931 • E-ISSN: 1464-0600 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02699931.2024.2425695 |
| PMID | 39530657 |
| OpenAlex | W4404272636 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 82 |
Individuals high in depressive symptom severity show probability bias: they believe negative events are relatively probable, and positive events relatively improbable, compared to those with less severe symptoms. However, this has only ever been demonstrated using self-report measures, in which participants explicitly estimate events' probabilities: this leaves open the risk that "probability bias" is merely an artefact of response bias. We tested the veracity of probability bias using an indirect behavioural measure, based on a sentence-reading task. Study 1 tested 112 Turkish students; Study 2 tested 117 international users of online groups for people with depressive and anxiety disorders. As predicted, participants with higher depressive symptom scores responded relatively quickly to sentences stating negative events might occur, and relatively slowly to sentences stating positive events might occur, compared to those with lower scores. This effect was only marginal in Study 1, but reached significance in Study 2. However, contrary to predictions, this effect was not moderated by the probability level stated in the sentence. This makes our findings difficult to interpret, and we must present these studies as a failure to convincingly demonstrate depression-related probability bias. We hope this stimulates more work on the nature and veracity of probability bias
Cognitive psychology · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health Research Topics · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychology
Unrealistic Optimism
Hopelessness depression
The Evolution of the Cognitive Model of Depression and Its Neurobiological Correlates
A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination
Dispositional optimism
Development and validation of the penn state worry questionnaire
Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models
Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety
The optimism bias
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
LmerTest Package
Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic
Probability, cost, and interpretation biases’ relationships with depressive and anxious symptom severity
The Shape of Belief
Risk Perception and Affect
Depression—Clinical, Experimental, and Theoretical Aspects
Self‐Regulation Processes and Health
Expectancy bias in anxious samples
Egocentrism and focalism in unrealistic optimism (and pessimism)
Future-event schemas and certainty about the future
An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |