Modulatory effects of goal relevance on emotional attention reveal that fear has a distinct value
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7149993 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xiaojuan Xue (0000-0002-1622-1161, Ghent University), Gilles Pourtois (0000-0002-5109-2801, Ghent University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 246-260 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognition & Emotion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-9931 • E-ISSN: 1464-0600 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02699931.2024.2405014 |
| PMID | 39291972 |
| OpenAlex | W4402583949 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 78 |
Threat-related stimuli can capture attention. However, it remains debated whether this capture is automatic or not. To address this question, we compared attentional biases to emotional faces using a dot-probe task (DPT) where emotion was never goal-relevant (Experiment 1) or made directly task-relevant by means of induction trials (Experiments 2-3). Moreover, the contingency between the DPT and induction trials was either partial (Experiment 2) or full (Experiment 3). Eye-tracking was used to ascertain that the emotional cue and the subsequent target were processed with peripheral vision. Experiments 1 and 2 both showed that negative faces captured attention, with faster target processing when it appeared on the same side as the preceding fearful face (i.e. fear-valid trials) compared to the opposite side where the neutral face was shown (i.e. fear-invalid trials), but also when it appeared on the side of the preceding neutral face (i.e. happy-invalid trials) compared to the happy face (i.e. happy-valid trials). Importantly, this preferential spatial orienting to negative emotion was not observed in Experiment 3, where the goal relevance of emotion was high. However, in that experiment, fearful faces produced a specific attentional bias during the DPT, which was mostly driven by the induction trials themselves
Cognitive psychology · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Perception and communication.
Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm
Emotional foundations of cognitive control
Controlled and automatic human information processing
Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Facial Expressions of Emotion
Attentional bias for threat
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control
Value-driven attentional capture
How brains beware
Automatic and effortful processes in memory.
Recognizing Emotion from Facial Expressions
Aging and Attentional Biases for Emotional Faces
Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior
Inhibition of return
Attention
The effects of emotion on attention
Room for Feelings
Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe paradigm
Working memory load reduces facilitated processing of threatening faces
Safety first
Testing a goal-driven account of involuntary attentional capture by threat
Combined effects of intrinsic and goal relevances on attention and action tendency during the emotional episode
Does emotion processing require attention? The effects of fear conditioning and perceptual load
Clearing the mind
Competing for attentional priority
Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology
A circumplex model of affect
Automaticity
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |