Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Does Speaking A Free Word Order Language Influence Sentence Planning and Production? Evidence From Pitjantjatjara (Pama‐Nyungan, Australia)

Bibliographic Data

ID7150302
AuthorsEvan Kidd (0000-0003-4301-2290, School of Literature, Languages, and Linguistics The Australian National University, corresponding author), Gabriela Garrido Rodríguez (0000-0002-7397-9067, ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language), Sasha Wilmoth (0000-0002-6626-9104, ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language), Javier E Garrido Guillén (School of Engineering and Science Tecnológico de Monterrey), Rachel Nordlinger (0000-0003-4126-8022, ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language)
Year2025
Volume49
Issue7
Pagese70087-e70087
Publication date2025-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognitive Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cogs.70087
PMID40684369
OpenAlexW4412495074
LanguageEN
References cited92

Sentence production is a stage‐like process of mapping a conceptual representation to the linear speech signal via grammatical rules. While the typological diversity of languages is vast and thus must necessarily influence sentence production, psycholinguistic studies of diverse languages are comparatively rare. Here, we present data from a sentence planning and production study in Pitjantjatjara, an Australian Indigenous language that has highly flexible word order. Forty‐nine ( N = 49) native speakers described pictures of two‐participant scenes while their eye‐movements were recorded. Participants produced all possible orders of agent, patient, and verb. There was a general preference to produce agent‐initial orders, but word order was influenced by the semantic properties of agent and patient referents (± human). Analyses of participants’ eye‐movements revealed early relational encoding of the entire event, whereby speakers distributed their attention between agent and patient referents in a manner that is different than typically observed in languages that have more restricted word order options. Relational encoding was influenced by the word order that participants eventually produced. The results provide evidence to suggest that sentence planning in Pitjantjatjara is a hierarchical process, in which early relational encoding creates a wholistic conceptualization of an event, possibly driven by pressure to decide upon one of many possible word orders

Cognition · Conceptualization · Language production · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Sentence · Verb · Word order · Computer Science · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Clause-initial position in four Australian languages

    Jane Simpson, Ilana Mushin•Grammar and discourse in…•2008

  • Constituency and Grammatical Relations in Australian languages

    Rachel Nordlinger•Languages and Linguistics of…•2014

  • Verb Serialisation and the Circumstantial Construction in Yankunytjatjara

    C Goddard•Complex Sentence Constructions in…•1988

  • Generalized Additive Models

    Simon N Wood•Generalized Additive Models•2017

  • Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R

    Open Access•Alain F Zuur, Alain Zuur et al.•Mixed Effects Models and…•2009

  • Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS

    Open Access•José C Pinheiro, David M Bates et al.•Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS•2000

  • Speaking

    Willem J M Levelt•Speaking•1989

  • The Representation of Verbs

    Open Access•Martin J Pickering, Holly P Branigan•Journal of Memory and Language•1998

  • Becoming syntactic.

    Franklin Chang, Gary S Dell et al.•Psychological Review•2006

  • From conceptual roles to structural relations

    Kathryn Bock, Helga Loebell et al.•Psychological Review•1992

  • What the Eyes Say About Speaking

    Open Access•Zenzi Griffin, Zenzi M Griffin et al.•Psychological Science•2000

  • On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation

    Open Access•Lila R Gleitman, David January et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2007

  • Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation

    Open Access•J Kathryn Bock, Richard K Warren•Cognition•1985

  • Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science

    Open Access•Damián E Blasi, J Henrich et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2022

  • Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression

    Open Access•Dale J Barr•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • The Analysis of Sentence Production

    Merrill F Garrett•The Psychology of learning and…•1975

  • Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms

    Open Access•Paul-Christian Bürkner•The R Journal•2018

  • Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing

    Open Access•Dale J Barr, Roger Levy et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2013

  • BRMS

    Open Access•Paul-Christian Bürkner•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Categorical data analysis

    Open Access•T Florian Jaeger•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

    Open Access•R Harald Baayen, D J Davidson et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • The Handbook of Psycholinguistics

    Open Access•Eva M FERNÁNDEZ, Helen Smith Cairns•Handbook of Psycholinguistics•2017

  • The Agent Preference in Visual Event Apprehension

    Open Access•Arrate Isasi-Isasmendi, Caroline Andrews et al.•Open MIND•2023

  • Contrast coding choices in a decade of mixed models

    Open Access•Laurel Brehm, Phillip M Alday•Journal of Memory and Language•2022

  • How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models

    Open Access•Daniel J Schad, Shravan Vasishth et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • Cross-linguistic differences in case marking shape neural power dynamics and gaze behavior during sentence planning

    Open Access•Aitor Egurtzegi, Damián E Blasi et al.•Brain and Language•2022

  • Diversity in research on the psychology of language

    Open Access•Robyn Berghoff, Emanuel Bylund•Cognition•2025

  • Finding your voice

    Open Access•Rowena Garcia, Jens Roeser et al.•Cognition•2023

  • Diversity in bilingual child language acquisition research

    Open Access•Sirada Rochanavibhata, Viorica Marian•First Language•2022

  • How diverse is child language acquisition research

    Open Access•Evan Kidd, Rowena Garcia•First Language•2022

  • Posture, location, existence, and states of being in two Central Australian languages

    C Goddard, Jean Harkins•The linguistics of sitting,…•2002

  • Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models

    Open Access•Dale J Barr•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Uncovering ergative use in Murrinhpatha

    Open Access•Rachel Nordlinger, Evan Kidd•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2023

  • Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages

    Open Access•Ken Hale•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1983

  • Categories, Constituents and Constituent Order in Pitjantjatjara

    Doris L Payne, Doris Payne et al.•Language•1993

  • Forty Years on

    Patrick Mcconvell, Jane Simpson et al.•Oceanic Linguistics•2003

  • The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar

    Nikolaus P Himmelmann, K Alexander Adelaar et al.•Austronesian Languages of Asia…•2004

  • Acquiring verb-argument structure in Tagalog

    Open Access•Rowena Garcia, Evan Kidd•Linguistics•2022

  • Case systems and case marking in Australian languages

    C Goddard•Australian Journal of Linguistics•1982

  • Indigenous multilingualisms past and present

    Open Access•Jill Vaughan, Ronald Singer et al.•Language & Communication•2018

  • Visual Attention and Structural Choice in Sentence Production Across Languages

    Open Access•Andriy Myachykov, Dominic Thompson et al.•Language and Linguistics Compass•2011

  • The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Production

    Open Access•T Florian Jaeger, Elisabeth Norcliffe et al.•Language and Linguistics Compass•2009

  • Interpreting null pronouns (pro) in isolated sentences

    Open Access•Kiel Christianson, Hee Youn Cho•Lingua•2009

  • Silence is talk

    Open Access•Ilana Mushin, R Gardner•Journal of Pragmatics•2009

  • Sentence planning and production in Murrinhpatha, an Australian 'free word order' language

    Open Access•Rachel Nordlinger, Gabriela Garrido Rodríguez et al.•Language•2022

  • On the Syntax of Obviation

    Judith Aissen•Language•1997

  • Ergativity

    Open Access•R M W Dixon•Ergativity•1994

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae