The Shape of Blame
The Relationship Between Statistical Norms and Judgments of Blame and Praise
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7150371 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dries H Bostyn (0000-0001-9994-4615, Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology Ghent University, corresponding author), Joshua Knobe (0000-0003-0733-3775, Program in Cognitive Science Yale University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | e70114-e70114 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognitive Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cogs.70114 |
| PMID | 40984830 |
| OpenAlex | W4414452711 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
For many types of behaviors, whether a specific instance of that behavior is blame‐ or praiseworthy depends on how much of the behavior is done or how people go about doing it. For instance, for a behavior such as “replying to an email in x days,” whether a specific reply is perceived as blameworthy or praiseworthy will depend on how many days have elapsed before the reply. Such behaviors lie on a continuum in which part of the continuum is praiseworthy (replying quickly) and another part of the continuum is blameworthy (replying late). In the current paper, we investigate how judgments of blame and praise on such behaviors relate to people's perceptions of the statistical norms surrounding that behavior (i.e., how quickly people usually reply). We find that people do not base judgments of blame and praise on a comparison to the statistically average quantity. Instead, judgments of blame and praise are related to whether the behavior is perceived as frequent or infrequent. Notably, frequency showed an asymmetric relationship with moral judgments: higher frequency was strongly associated with reduced blame but showed a much weaker association with reduced praise
Attribution · Blame · Perception · Praise · Statistical analysis · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Psychology of Social Influence
Vagueness and grammar
On the genesis of abstract ideas.
Domain generality versus modality specificity
Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.
Changing climates of conflict
RCTs to Scale
Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms
Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition
Implicit learning and statistical learning
Family resemblances
Normality
What comes to mind
Generics and Quantified Generalizations
A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct
Harking
The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation
Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect
It's not what you do, but what everyone else does
Sensitivity to ingroup and outgroup norms in the association between commonality and morality
A Theory of Social Comparison Processes
A focus theory of normative conduct
Normative Social Influence is Underdetected
A Room with a Viewpoint
| Highly cited | No |
|---|