Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Losing Phonotactic Distinctions in Context

Bibliographic Data

ID7150385
AuthorsJohn M Starr (0009-0007-0801-0165, Department of Linguistics Cornell University, corresponding author), Marten van Schijndel (0000-0002-9858-5881, Department of Linguistics Cornell University)
Year2025
Volume49
Issue4
Pagese70059-e70059
Publication date2025-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognitive Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cogs.70059
PMID40230064
OpenAlexW4409465242
LanguageEN
References cited70

Previous psycholinguistic research has demonstrated that sentence processing varies according to both syntactic and discourse context. However, a systematic investigation of how such contexts influence how the processor manages low‐level representations of linguistic structure has yet to be carried out. In this paper, we conduct a series of self‐paced reading experiments which show how one well‐established linguistic measurement—phonotactic distinctions between non‐words—varies according to the phonological, syntactic, and discourse context that the non‐words appear in. Our results demonstrate that the various types of context that we control for can influence both when and if phonotactic distinctions surface. More broadly, our findings suggest that well‐established phonological and psycholinguistic effects may not generalize when tested in larger contexts

Cognition · Linguistics · Phonology · Phonotactics · Psycholinguistics · Sentence · Sentence processing · Computer Science · History · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development

  • Using prosody to avoid ambiguity

    Open Access•Jesse Snedeker, John C Trueswell et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2003

  • Rhetorical Structure Theory

    William C Mann, Scott A Thompson et al.•Third Text•1988

  • Recognizing Spoken Words

    Paul A Luce, David B Pisoni•Ear and Hearing•1998

  • On not being led up the garden path

    Open Access•Stephen Crain, Mark Steedman•Natural Language Parsing•1985

  • Determinants of Wordlikeness

    Open Access•Todd M Bailey, Ulrike Hahn•Journal of Memory and Language•2001

  • Subjacency as a processing phenomenon

    Robert Kluender, Marta Kutas•Language and Cognitive Processes•1993

  • When Words Compete

    Open Access•Michael S Vitevitch, Paul A Luce•Psychological Science•1998

  • Processing relative clauses in Chinese

    Open Access•Franny Hsiao, Franny Pai-Fang Hsiao et al.•Cognition•2003

  • The temporal structure of spoken language understanding

    Open Access•William Marslen-Wilson, William D Marslen‐Wilson et al.•Cognition•1980

  • LmerTest Package

    Open Access•Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B Brockhoff et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation

    Hans Kamp•Truth, Interpretation and…•2013

  • Greater Early Disambiguating Information for Less-Probable Words

    Open Access•Adam King, Andrew Wedel•Open MIND•2020

  • Unlearnable phonotactics

    Open Access•Enes Avcu, Arild Hestvik•Glossa a journal of general…•2020

  • The role of predictability in shaping phonological patterns

    Kathleen Currie Hall, Elizabeth Hume et al.•Linguistics Vanguard•2018

  • Feature-based generalisation as a source of gradient acceptability

    Open Access•Adam Albright•Phonology•2009

  • The gradual path to cluster simplification

    Open Access•John J Mccarthy•Phonology•2008

  • Constraint cumulativity in phonotactics

    Open Access•Canaan M Brei•Phonology•2020

  • Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I. Adult data

    Open Access•Anne Christophe, Anne‐caroline Fiévet et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2004

  • Reading relative clauses in English

    Open Access•Edward Gibson, Timothy Desmet et al.•Cognitive Linguistics•2005

  • Phonotactics and Syllable Stress

    Open Access•Michael S Vitevitch, Paul A Luce et al.•Language and Speech•1997

  • Subject-Object Ambiguities in German Embedded Clauses

    Open Access•Markus Bader, Michael Meng•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1999

  • Lexical retrieval from fragments of spoken words

    Open Access•Sieb G Nooteboom•Journal of Phonetics•1981

  • The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension

    Open Access•Fernanda Ferreira, Nikole D Patson•Language and Linguistics Compass•2007

  • A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning

    Bruce Hayes, Camille Wilson et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2008

  • Phonological Naturalness and Phonotactic Learning

    Bruce Hayes, James White•Linguistic Inquiry•2013

  • Phonological markedness effects in sentence formation

    Canaan Brei, Canaan M Brei et al.•Language•2020

  • The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar

    Paul J Hopper, Scott A Thompson et al.•Language•1984

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae