Brokering Power
Bureaucratic Contestations in Participatory Forest Governance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7150812 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roshni Kutty (0009-0006-6181-0519, PhD Student, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Karnataka, India), Ajit Menon (0000-0001-8857-003X, Madras Institute of Development Studies (MIDS), Tamil Nadu, India) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 41-51 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0972-4923 • E-ISSN: 0975-3133 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4103/cs.cs_6_24 |
| OpenAlex | W4409370419 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
The success of forest governance reforms aimed at decentralisation, local participation, and sustainable resource use depends on the bureaucracy implementing such reforms. One such case of decentralised forest governance is the Forest Rights Act (FRA) in India, which recognises the rights of traditional forest dwellers to forest resources that they historically used. Most studies on FRA implementation have only highlighted the obstructionist role played by state forest departments. However, the implementation of the FRA is the joint responsibility of the revenue, forest, and tribal welfare departments. This article examines the role and interplay of power among all three departments in determining implementation outcomes. Employing bureaucratic politics theory and an actor-centred power framework, the paper argues that unless power inequalities within a multi-department implementation setting are addressed, failure in implementing decentralised forest policies is a foregone conclusion. Addressing these power inequalities through collateral structural changes in the concerned departments and regular training can help in effective implementation
Bureaucracy · Business · Citizen journalism · Corporate governance · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Law · Public Administration
A future agenda for environmental restorative justice
Bureaucratic Barriers Limit Local Participatory Governance in Protected Areas in Costa Rica
From governance to government
Back to basics
Bureaucracy and new management paradigms
Promoting a responsive state
Actor-centred power
Denial of Rights Continues
The management of irrigation systems
Advocating for Change? How a Civil Society-led Coalition Influences the Implementation of the Forest Rights Act in India
Rethinking elite persistence in neoliberalism
In the Eyes of the State
Committee Chairs and Legislative Review in Parliamentary Democracies
Policy and power
Foundations of organization power
The Myth of the Dichotomy
Does Affirmative Action Worsen Bureaucratic Performance? Evidence from the Indian Administrative Service
Explaining government bureaucrats’ behaviour
Democratic Assertions
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |