Short Take
An Approach to Decision-making in Community-based Participatory Research to Foster Co-ownership and Trust
Bibliographic Data
This Short Take describes the rationale for, and use of, a decision-making process in community-engaged comparative effectiveness research, co-led by community researchers and academic researchers. The contribution of this methodological guide is to (1) ensure that all partners have a voice in contributing to major study decisions; (2) distribute power equally; (3) avoid power differentials; (4) increase trust; and (5) promote shared governance in research
Citizen journalism · Community-based participatory research · Corporate governance · Participatory action research · Power (physics) · Process (computing) · Community and Sustainable Development · Community Health and Development · Health Policy Implementation Science
Power Dynamics in Community-Based Participatory Research
Building consensus in research partnerships
When Should the Majority Rule? Experimental Evidence for Madisonian Judgments in Five Cultures
Collaboration Strategies in Nontraditional Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships
Enhancing Stewardship of Community-Engaged Research Through Governance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |