Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The construct of integrated group discussion (IGD) among undergraduate students

To what extent does group discussion performance reflect performance on IGD tasks

Bibliographic Data

ID7155437
AuthorsChoo Mui Cheong (0000-0001-9590-7681, Faculty of Education , The University of Hong Kong , Pokfulam , Hong Kong), Wandong Xu (0000-0003-0256-8954, Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hung Hom , Hong Kong), Wei Pang (0000-0002-1901-0511, Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hung Hom , Hong Kong), Siyu Zhu (0000-0001-5253-9428, Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hung Hom , Hong Kong), Liu Xian (0000-0002-4470-8436, Department of Chinese Language Studies , The Education University of Hong Kong 66390 , Ting Kok , Hong Kong), Xian Liao (Education University of Hong Kong)
Year2025
Volume63
Issue2
Pages1059-1091
Publication date2025-06-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0019-042X • E-ISSN: 1613-4141
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/iral-2023-0073
OpenAlexW4400779327
LanguageEN
References cited51

Integrated group discussion (IGD) tasks represent a new type of integrated speaking task that requires students to communicate with their peers after comprehending and using provided source materials. With its potential to enhance effective communication and information literacy, IGD stands at the core of language education. Although the IGD task type has become increasingly popular, its construct is still unexplored. In this study, 124 Hong Kong undergraduate students completed an IGD task and a group discussion (GD) task (i.e., without source materials) in Putonghua. Four factors, speech and expression , content with source use , interaction , and language usage , were extracted to represent IGD performance. Two indicators of GD performance ( linguistic expression and engagement in interaction ) significantly predicted IGD performance, explaining 21.9 % of its total variance. The large proportion of unexplained IGD performance variance suggests that IGD tasks may be worth implementing. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed in details

Antibody · Biology · Construct (python library) · Group (periodic table) · Immunoglobulin D · Chemistry · Computer Science · Immunology · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology

  • Assessment of Speaking

    Open Access•April Ginther•Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics•2012

  • Assessing Vocabulary

    Open Access•John Read•Assessing Vocabulary•2000

  • Assessing Speaking

    Open Access•Sari Luoma•Assessing Speaking•2004

  • The Uses of Argument

    Open Access•Stephen Toulmin, Stephen Edelston Toulmin•Uses of Argument•2003

  • Speaking

    Willem J M Levelt•Speaking•1989

  • Interactional Competence

    Evelina D Galaczi, Lynda Taylor•Language Assessment Quarterly•2018

  • An integrated theory of language production and comprehension

    Open Access•Martin J Pickering, Simon Garrod•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2013

  • Communicative Competence

    Marianne Celce‐murcia, Marianne Celce-Murcia et al.•Issues in Applied Linguistics•1995

  • Facets of Speaking Proficiency

    Open Access•Nivja H De Jong, Margarita P Steinel et al.•Studies in Second Language…•2012

  • Growth points in thinking-for-speaking

    Open Access•Dougal Mcneill, David Mcneill et al.•Language and Gesture•2000

  • Test-Takers’ Strategic Behaviors in Independent and Integrated Speaking Tasks

    Khaled Barkaoui, Lindsay Brooks et al.•Applied Linguistics•2013

  • The Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis in Communication Research

    Open Access•Hee Sun Park, René Dailey et al.•Human Communication Research•2002

  • Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research

    Open Access•Robin K Henson, J Kyle Roberts•Educational and Psychological…•2006

  • Knowledge-building

    Karl Maton, Susan Hood et al.•Knowledge-building•2015

  • Dependability of scores for a new ESL speaking assessment consisting of integrated and independent tasks

    Open Access•Yong-Won Lee, Yong‐Won Lee•Language Testing•2006

  • Speaking proficiency of young language students

    Open Access•Ching‐Ni Hsieh, Ching-Ni Hsieh et al.•Language Testing•2019

  • The contribution of test-takers’ speech content to scores on an English oral proficiency test

    Open Access•Takanori Sato•Language Testing•2012

  • Topic and background knowledge effects on performance in speaking assessment

    Open Access•Nahal Khabbazbashi•Language Testing•2017

  • Responding to a Toefl iBT integrated speaking task

    Open Access•Kellie Frost, Josh Clothier et al.•Language Testing•2020

  • Construct validity in Toefl iBT speaking tasks

    Open Access•Kristopher Kyle, Scott A Crossley et al.•Language Testing•2016

  • Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment

    Open Access•Lia Plakans•Language Testing•2009

  • Investigating the validity of an integrated listening-speaking task

    Open Access•Kellie Frost, Catherine Elder et al.•Language Testing•2012

  • A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET-SET group discussion

    Open Access•Lianzhen He, Ying Dai et al.•Language Testing•2006

  • Assessing Second Language Speaking Proficiency

    Open Access•Nivja H De Jong•Annual Review of Linguistics•2022

  • Readers as Writers Composing From Sources

    Open Access•Nancy Nelson Spivey, James R King•Reading Research Quarterly•1989

  • Strategy Use in Oral Communication with Competent Synthesis and Complex Interaction

    Open Access•Xinhua Zhu, Liu Xian et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2019

  • Two Ways of Defining Communication Strategies

    Open Access•Claus Færch, G Kasper•Language Learning•1984

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae