Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Social media as a behavior depolarizer

Evidence from Russia–Ukraine conflict

Bibliographic Data

ID7155751
AuthorsJitendra Yadav (0000-0003-2686-1864, ICFAI Business School), Kuldeep Singh (0000-0002-8180-4646, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation), Nripendra P Rana (0000-0003-1105-8729, Qatar University), Donnacha Dennehy (0000-0001-9931-762X, Swansea University)
Year2025
Volume38
Issue2
Pages1110-1133
Publication date2025-03-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInformation Technology and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0959-3845 • E-ISSN: 1758-5813
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/itp-12-2022-0972
OpenAlexW4390735156
LanguageEN
References cited81

Purpose Social media has played a pivotal role in polarizing views on Russia–Ukraine conflict. The effects of polarization in online interactions have been extensively studied in many contexts. This research aims to examine how multiple social media sources may act as an integrator of information and act as a platform for depolarizing behaviors. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes the communications of 6,662 tweets related to the sanctions imposed on Russia by using textual analytics and predictive modeling. Findings The research findings reveal that the tweeting behavior of netizens was depolarized because of information from multiple social media sources. However, the influx of information from non-organizational sources such as trending topics and discussions has a depolarizing impact on the user’s pre-established attitude. Research limitations/implications For policymakers, conflict mediators and observers, and members of society in general, there is a need for (1) continuous and consistent communication throughout the crisis, (2) transparency in the information being communicated and (3) public awareness of the polarized and conflicting information being provided from multiple actors that may be biased in the claims being made about the conflict crisis. Originality/value While previous research has examined Russia–Ukraine conflict from a variety of perspectives, this is the first study to examine how social media might be used to reduce attitude polarization during times of conflict

Cynicism · Originality · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sanctions · Social media · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Media Technologies

    Christopher Kelty, E Gabriella Coleman et al.•Media Technologies•2014

  • Dynamic consent

    Open Access•Jonathan Kaye, Jane Kaye et al.•European Journal of Human Genetics•2015

  • Principal component analysis

    Open Access•Hervé Abdi, Lynne J Williams•WIREs Computational Statistics•2010

  • Incivility on Facebook and political polarization

    Open Access•Yonghwan Kim, Youngju Kim•Computers in Human Behavior•2019

  • Tweeting From Left to Right

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá et al.•Psychological Science•2015

  • Loopholes in the Echo Chambers

    Open Access•Stefan Geiß, Melanie Magin et al.•Digital Journalism•2021

  • Understanding misinformation and rumors that generated panic buying as a social practice during Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Muhammad Naeem, Wilson Ozuem•Information Technology and People•2022

  • Be my friend! Cultivating parasocial relationships with social media influencers

    Open Access•Eugene Cheng-Xi Aw, Garry Wei-Han Tan et al.•Information Technology and People•2023

  • Social media analytics for end-users' expectation management in information systems development projects

    Open Access•Snehasish Banerjee, Jyoti Prakash Singh et al.•Information Technology and People•2021

  • Too good to be true, too good not to share

    Andrew Duffy, Edson C Tandoc et al.•Information Communication & Society•2020

  • Sourcing practices of online news media in Switzerland during the war in Ukraine

    Open Access•Linards Udris, Daniel Vogler et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2023

  • Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis

    Open Access•Thijs Van De Graaf, Jeff D Colgan•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • Undercurrents of echo chambers and flame wars

    Open Access•Ilkka Koiranen, Aki Koivula et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2021

  • Fake News

    Irina Khaldarova, Mervi Pantti•Journalism Practice•2016

  • Forensic conflict studies

    Open Access•Jakob Hauter•Media War & Conflict•2021

  • Agenda divergence in a developing conflict

    Open Access•Olessia Koltsova, Sergei Pashakhin•Media War & Conflict•2019

  • Personalizing the war

    Open Access•Mykola Makhortykh, Mariella Bastian•Media War & Conflict•2020

  • Social media and visual framing of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine

    Open Access•Mykola Makhortykh, Maryna Sydorova•Media War & Conflict•2017

  • Ukraine after five years of conflict

    Paul D’anieri, Taras Kuzio•Eurasian Geography and Economics•2019

  • EU-Russia regulatory competition and business interests in post-Soviet countries

    Aron Buzogány•Eurasian Geography and Economics•2016

  • Russian Intervention in Ukraine

    Alexander Tabachnik•Nationalism and Ethnic Politics•2020

  • When Interdependence Produces Conflict

    Andrej Krickovic•Arms Control•2015

  • Echo chambers online

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2009

  • Donbas Conflict

    Open Access•Adam Potočňák, Miroslav Mareš•Problems of Post-Communism•2022

  • Out of Gas

    Adam N Stulberg•Problems of Post-Communism•2015

  • Advancing a Dual-Process Model to Explain Interpersonal Versus Intergroup Communication in Social Media

    Open Access•Alexandra Hinck, Caleb T Carr•Communication Theory•2020

  • Making Sense of the News in an Authoritarian Regime

    Maxim Alyukov•Europe Asia Studies•2022

  • Conflicts and Shifts in the Kremlin’s Political Discourse since the Start of the Putin Presidency (2000–2019)

    Martin Mölder, Eiki Berg•Europe Asia Studies•2022

  • The Law of Group Polarization

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein•Journal of Political Philosophy•2002

  • Characteristics of quantifiers moderate the framing effect

    Open Access•Dawn Liu Holford, Marie Juanchich et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2021

  • Computing the everyday

    Cristina Alaimo, Jannis Kallinikos•The Information Society•2017

  • Beyond individual-centric privacy

    Open Access•Wolter Pieters•The Information Society•2017

  • What you google is where you are from

    Elad Segev, Sandrine Boudana•The Information Society•2022

  • Social network dynamics, bots, and community-based online misinformation spread

    Lichen Zhen, Bei Yan et al.•The Information Society•2023

  • Governing online platforms

    Open Access•Natali Helberger, Jo Pierson et al.•The Information Society•2018

  • Disinformation and the media

    Open Access•Ulises A Mejias, Nikolai E Vokuev•Media Culture & Society•2017

  • Allport meets internet

    Open Access•Chiara Imperato, Barry H Schneider et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Public sentiment towards economic sanctions in the Russia–Ukraine war

    Open Access•Vu Minh Ngo, Luu Duc Toan Huynh et al.•Scottish Journal of Political…•2022

  • Mass Media in Interstate Conflicts

    Dmitrii P Gavra, Alena Sergeevna Savitskaya•Russian Journal of Communication•2011

  • Second Decade, Second Chance? Parliament, Politics and Democratic Aspirations in Russia, Ukraine and Moldova

    William E Crowther, W E L H Crowther•Journal of Legislative Studies•2011

  • Fighting Propaganda with Censorship

    Yevgeniy Golovchenko•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Social media and Russian territorial irredentism

    Jesse Driscoll, Zachary C Steinert-Threlkeld•Post-Soviet Affairs•2020

  • Transformed by contested digital spaces? Social media and Ukrainian diasporic ‘selves’ in the wake of the conflict with Russia

    Open Access•Ivan Kozachenko•Nations and Nationalism•2021

  • How Social Media Is Changing Conflict

    Open Access•Thomas Zeitzoff•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2017

  • Not on speaking terms, but business as usual

    Tom Casier•East European Politics•2020

  • (Almost) Everything in Moderation

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Andrew M Gue et al.•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Framing and counter-framing a Peace March in Russia

    Olena Nikolayenko•Social movement studies•2019

  • State, media and civil society in the information warfare over Ukraine

    Open Access•Yevgeniy Golovchenko, Mareike Hartmann et al.•International Affairs•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae