Integrating Co-Created and Theory-Driven Insights
A Worked Example Using an Equitable and Power Sharing Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7156559 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nessa Millet (0000-0001-5468-5197, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, corresponding author), Reney Karsten (Utrecht University), Breanna W Bosman (Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Sammy Albader (0009-0004-9860-9849, Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Baudewijntje P C Kreukels (0000-0002-9713-4835, Amsterdam University Medical Centers), David Matthew Doyle (0000-0002-8010-6870, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/16094069251381898 |
| OpenAlex | W7119141827 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 48 |
Co-creation with citizens has emerged as an integral component in tackling a plethora of healthcare inequities. At the stage of scientific conceptualization, processes of integrating co-created insights as legitimate forms of knowledge lack transparent methods, risking disempowerment for citizens who have been positioned as influencing research processes and outcomes. We detail an approach to integrating co-created insights into a scientific model using an equitable and power-sharing approach (EPSA) method, exampled during the study design phase of the AFFIRM Relationships project. The EPSA method consists of three phases: a preparatory phase (researcher reflexivity, topic formulation and sensitization); a co-creation phase (knowledge production, analytic phases, summarizing and ethics work) and an insight integration phase. Applying the EPSA method highlighted the important role of researcher reflexivity in preparing to foster a safe environment for open dialogue during co-creation. Transforming scientific research stages into activities that can engage co-researchers (including conducting analysis, critical thinking, and producing overarching themes) underscored an equitable partnership. While the final phase enabled identification of how resulting knowledge was derived (i.e., via co-creation or existing theory), further consideration of how refinement processes can be grounded in lived experience is necessary, particularly during final stages as decision-making becomes increasingly led by academic team members
Component (thermodynamics) · Grounded theory · Identification (biology) · Phase (matter) · Power (physics) · Process (computing) · Reflexivity · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Participatory Visual Research Methods
An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation
Research co-design in health
Health Education and Community Empowerment
Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions
The dark side of coproduction
Be(com)ing a reflexive researcher
Achieving Research Impact Through Co‐creation in Community‐Based Health Services
Lost in the shadows
Toward good practice in thematic analysis
‘You want to deal with power while riding on power’
Mapping definitions of co‐production and co‐design in health and social care
A systematic review of psychosocial functioning changes after gender-affirming hormone therapy among transgender people
Is Co-production Just a Pipe Dream for Applied Health Research Commissioning? An Exploratory Literature Review
Enriching the evidence base of co-creation research in public health with methodological principles of critical realism
Studying trans
Everyday ethics in professional life
Reflections on doing participatory research in health
Undoing Theory
Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes
Transnormativity in the psy disciplines
Applying critical realism in qualitative research
On Quantitizing
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Community control’ in CBPR
The Social Ecology of Power in Participatory Health Research
Social relationship experiences of transgender people and their relational partners
An Introduction to Concept Mapping as a Participatory Public Health Research Method
Supporting Inclusion and Participation for People Living With Dementia
Reflections on Researcher Identity and Power
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |