Can We See Their ID? Measuring Immigrants’ Legal Trajectory
Lessons From a French Survey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7156992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julia Descamps (0000-0003-4691-4732, INED, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 2193-2224 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Migration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0197-9183 • E-ISSN: 1747-7379 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01979183241295995 |
| OpenAlex | W4404362000 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
There is a growing interest in the question of immigrants’ legal trajectories, but there have been few quantitative surveys on the subject, due to the lack of satisfactory data. Most existing statistical studies use biographical surveys where current or past legal status is used as an explanatory variable for studying other social phenomena, but these studies rarely question the quality of that measurement. Some studies quantified the potential biases, but did not qualify them. Reporting legal status can generate defiance when the trajectory is a sensitive issue (social desirability bias). It can be difficult if the migration process is long past (memory bias), or the respondent did not make their application themselves (nonproactivity bias). Using a retrospective biographical survey of about 10,000 immigrants in France, I offer a reflexive analysis of these biases. I show that they are small, the data showing low nonresponse rates, and a remarkable internal and external consistency. Biased responses can be attributed to the difficulty in recalling events, grasping some technical terms, or even to the desire to control one's migratory narrative in a context of downward social status. These results teach us that legal status should more often be included in surveys, which would improve theorization of migrants’ experiences, but also better link these theories with public policies. The results inform us about how immigrants take hold of the official categories, suggesting that they have more expertise and less defiance in reporting them that we could have assumed
Demographic economics · Economics · Immigration · Political science · Sociology · Trajectory · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Identity, and Health · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Gender, Migration and Categorisation
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys
Outsiders
Legal Status and Wage Disparities for Mexican Immigrants
Derrière le sans-papiers, le travailleur
Pathways to Permanence
From Illegal to Legal
Can We Measure Immigrants’ Legal Status? Lessons from Two U.S. Surveys
Legal Histories as Determinants of Incorporation
Pathways into Irregular Status among Senegalese Migrants in Europe
Undocumented and Unwell
Collection of Legal Status Information
The Effect of Legalization on the Labor Markets of Latin American Immigrants
Traces in the shadow
Legal Status, Gender, and Labor Market Participation of Senegalese Migrants in France, Italy, and Spain
Born Again French
From illegalised migrant toward permanent resident
Questions de politique
Trajectoires et Origines 2019-2020 (TeO2)
A propos des biographies
Multiple (il)legal pathways
Family reunification - who, when, and how? Family trajectories among migrants in Italy
Des flux migratoires aux carrières migratoires
L'illusion biographique
Les trois "âges" de l'émigration algérienne en France
Biographies, flux, itinéraires, trajectoires
Liminal Legality
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |