Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

A Discussion of Current Risk and Future Reward

An Ethnography of UK Developer-Funded Urban Archaeology and its 21st Century Construction Industry Context

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7159397
AutoresGuillermo Díaz De Liaño (0000-0003-0108-9732, Museum of London Archaeology, autor de correspondencia), Sadie Watson (0000-0001-7188-3611, Museum of London Archaeology)
Año2026
Volumen51
Número1
Páginas65-77
Fecha de publicación2026-01-02
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Field Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0093-4690 • E-ISSN: 2042-4582
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00934690.2025.2574131
OpenAlexW4415651155
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas52

This article presents an ethnographic exploration of the relationship between archaeology and construction in the context of developer-funded projects. Although what follows is a UK-focused discussion, much will be relevant in countries where the Valletta Convention has been ratified (Council of Europe 1992) and where developer-funded (or preventive) systems operate, so an international context is provided to widen the scope of this study. We provide some contextualized background to both occupations, examining major differences and some similarities in practice. We then analyze communication between both disciplines, as well as the perception of archaeology as a risk for developers, before arguing that the notion of incommensurability helps us understand both issues. This phenomenon can be observed in the need that archaeologists have to “translate” when interacting and working in developer-funded contexts and by the issues caused by uncertainty, which is a key tenet of archaeological epistemologies, as recently explored by Frieman’s discussion of unproof (2024); both elements are also affected by the unequal relationship of power within which this specific archaeological praxis exists

Construction industry · Context (archaeology) · Current (fluid) · Ethnography · Excavation · Materiality (auditing) · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · Medieval Architecture and Archaeology

  • Embracing Ethnography

    David Oswald, Léon olde Scholtenhuis•Embracing Ethnography•2024

  • Ethnographic Archaeologies

    Quetzil E Castañeda, Christopher N Matthews•Ethnographic Archaeologies•2008

  • Design, When Everybody Designs

    Ezio Manzini, Rachel Coad•Design, When Everybody Designs•2015

  • Designs for the Pluriverse

    Arturo Escobar•Designs for the Pluriverse•2018

  • The Unethical Enterprise of the Past

    Open Access•E Parga Dans, Pablo Alonso González•Journal of Business Ethics•2021

  • It’s Not Mitigation! Policy and Practice in Development-Led Archaeology in England

    Roger Thomas•The Historic Environment Policy &…•2019

  • Critical Approaches to Fieldwork

    Gavin Lucas•Critical Approaches to Fieldwork•2001

  • Malta Beyond Malta

    Open Access•David Barreiro, Rocío Varela Pousa et al.•Cuadernos de Prehistoria y…•2018

  • Public Benefit

    Open Access•Sadie Watson•Internet Archaeology•2021

  • Neoliberal Multiculturalism and Contract Archeology in Northern Chile

    Open Access•Patricia Ayala, Patricia Ayala Rocabado•International Journal of…•2015

  • In Praise of Vagueness

    Open Access•Tim Flohr Sørensen•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2015

  • When megaprojects meet archaeology

    Sara Bonini Baraldi, Daniel Shoup et al.•International Journal of Cultural…•2017

  • Rescue archaeology

    Jean-Paul Demoule•Public Archaeology•2002

  • Institutionalizing a “developer pays” Principle for Commercial Archaeology as Part of Changing China-Africa Economic Relations

    Open Access•Paul Lane•African Archaeological Review•2025

  • London in the Roman World

    Dominic Perring•London in the Roman World•2021

  • On Contract Archaeology

    Open Access•Cristóbal Gnecco, Adriana Schmidt Dias•International Journal of…•2015

  • Honoring Ambiguity/Problematizing Certitude

    Open Access•Joan M Gero•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2007

  • On Disciplinary Culture

    Open Access•Stephanie Moser•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2007

  • Wicked Problems for Archaeologists

    J Schofield•Wicked Problems for Archaeologists•2024

  • Towards New Futures for Archaeological Data Production

    Open Access•Sara Perry, Anna Simandiraki‐grimshaw et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2025

  • Here and Now

    Orestis Apostolikas•Norwegian Archaeological Review•2024

  • Artefactual Persons

    T Yarrow•Norwegian Archaeological Review•2003

  • The Mandate for Speculation

    Open Access•Tim Flohr Sørensen, Marko Marila et al.•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2024

  • Arqueología por contrato y nuevos contratos arqueológicos

    Open Access•Wilhelm Londoño, Wilhelm Londoño Díaz•Jangwa Pana•2016

  • Destruction and the Rhetoric of Excavation

    Gavin Lucas•Norwegian Archaeological Review•2001

  • Isomorphism and legitimacy in Spanish contract archaeology

    E Parga Dans, Eva Parga-Dans et al.•International Journal of Heritage…•2016

  • Attending to unproof

    Open Access•Catherine J Frieman•Antiquity•2024

  • Interpretation not record

    Open Access•Gill Andrews, John C Barrett et al.•Antiquity•2000

  • Whither archaeologists? Continuing challenges to field practice

    Open Access•Sadie Watson•Antiquity•2019

  • Translating worlds

    Open Access•William F Hanks, Carlo Severi•Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory•2014

  • Risk factors for the occurrence of sexual misconduct during archaeological and anthropological fieldwork

    Open Access•Danielle J Bradford, Enrico R Crema•American Anthropologist•2022

  • Is archaeology conceivable within the degrowth movement

    Open Access•Nicolas Zorzin•Archaeological Dialogues•2021

  • Degrowth and a sustainable future for archaeology

    Open Access•J L Flexner•Archaeological Dialogues•2020

  • Excavation methodologies and labour as epistemic concerns in the practice of archaeology. Comparing examples from British and Andean archaeology

    Open Access•Mark Leighton, Mary Leighton•Archaeological Dialogues•2015

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae