A Discussion of Current Risk and Future Reward
An Ethnography of UK Developer-Funded Urban Archaeology and its 21st Century Construction Industry Context
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7159397 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Guillermo Díaz De Liaño (0000-0003-0108-9732, Museum of London Archaeology, autor de correspondencia), Sadie Watson (0000-0001-7188-3611, Museum of London Archaeology) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 51 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 65-77 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Field Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0093-4690 • E-ISSN: 2042-4582 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00934690.2025.2574131 |
| OpenAlex | W4415651155 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 52 |
This article presents an ethnographic exploration of the relationship between archaeology and construction in the context of developer-funded projects. Although what follows is a UK-focused discussion, much will be relevant in countries where the Valletta Convention has been ratified (Council of Europe 1992) and where developer-funded (or preventive) systems operate, so an international context is provided to widen the scope of this study. We provide some contextualized background to both occupations, examining major differences and some similarities in practice. We then analyze communication between both disciplines, as well as the perception of archaeology as a risk for developers, before arguing that the notion of incommensurability helps us understand both issues. This phenomenon can be observed in the need that archaeologists have to “translate” when interacting and working in developer-funded contexts and by the issues caused by uncertainty, which is a key tenet of archaeological epistemologies, as recently explored by Frieman’s discussion of unproof (2024); both elements are also affected by the unequal relationship of power within which this specific archaeological praxis exists
Construction industry · Context (archaeology) · Current (fluid) · Ethnography · Excavation · Materiality (auditing) · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · Medieval Architecture and Archaeology
Embracing Ethnography
Ethnographic Archaeologies
Design, When Everybody Designs
Designs for the Pluriverse
The Unethical Enterprise of the Past
It’s Not Mitigation! Policy and Practice in Development-Led Archaeology in England
Critical Approaches to Fieldwork
Malta Beyond Malta
Public Benefit
Neoliberal Multiculturalism and Contract Archeology in Northern Chile
In Praise of Vagueness
When megaprojects meet archaeology
Rescue archaeology
Institutionalizing a “developer pays” Principle for Commercial Archaeology as Part of Changing China-Africa Economic Relations
London in the Roman World
On Contract Archaeology
Honoring Ambiguity/Problematizing Certitude
On Disciplinary Culture
Wicked Problems for Archaeologists
Towards New Futures for Archaeological Data Production
Here and Now
Artefactual Persons
The Mandate for Speculation
Arqueología por contrato y nuevos contratos arqueológicos
Destruction and the Rhetoric of Excavation
Isomorphism and legitimacy in Spanish contract archaeology
Attending to unproof
Interpretation not record
Whither archaeologists? Continuing challenges to field practice
Translating worlds
Risk factors for the occurrence of sexual misconduct during archaeological and anthropological fieldwork
Is archaeology conceivable within the degrowth movement
Degrowth and a sustainable future for archaeology
Excavation methodologies and labour as epistemic concerns in the practice of archaeology. Comparing examples from British and Andean archaeology
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |