Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Asymmetric item isolation effects

Support for a Process Difference Between Absolute and Relative Judgments

Bibliographic Data

ID7163304
AuthorsJerwen Jou (0000-0002-3056-5059, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume33
Issue9
Pages1097-1110
Publication date2025-10-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMemory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09658211.2025.2553669
PMID40923527
OpenAlexW4414081617
LanguageEN
References cited44

This study used an odd (isolated) item inserted into a homogeneous serial list to investigate process differences between absolute- and relative-order judgments. The serial list consisted of eight names of people ordered in height. These were all male or female names except the fourth name which was of the opposite gender. A name/rank pair accuracy recognition test was used as the absolute judgment, and a comparative judgment (comparing height ranks between two names) as the relative judgment. Reaction time (RT) was the dependent measure for the close-to-ceiling accurate performance. Although the isolated item gained a memory advantage in both the absolute and relative judgments, the magnitudes of the effects differed greatly between the two judgments. For the absolute judgment, the isolated item's RT dropped below the levels of the two end terms, transforming the homogeneous condition's bow-shaped serial-position curve into one with two fully blown bowings. On the other hand, the isolated item caused only a moderate dent on the relative-judgment function with the curve keeping the original overall single-bowing shape. A hypothesis suggesting that absolute judgments are based more on individual-item specific information processing whereas relative judgments more on relational-information processing was proposed to explain the asymmetric isolation effects

Absolute threshold · Homogeneous · Serial learning · Child and Animal Learning Development · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Memory Processes and Influences

  • Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons

    Open Access•Arthur B Markman, Dedre Gentner•Cognitive Psychology•1993

  • Respects for similarity.

    Douglas L Medin, Robert L Goldstone et al.•Psychological Review•1993

  • Relational and item-specific information in memory

    Open Access•R Reed Hunt, Gilles O Einstein•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1981

  • Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld

    Open Access•Hedwig von Restorff•Psychological Research•1933

  • Context theory of classification learning.

    Douglas L Medin, Marguerite M Schaffer•Psychological Review•1978

  • Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.

    John R Anderson, Gordon H Bower•Psychological Review•1972

  • Can an isolated middle-series item make a “Dent” in the bow-shaped serial-position curve of comparative judgments

    Open Access•Jerwen Jou, Kaelyn G Calma et al.•Psychological Research•2024

  • Redefining the Congruity Effect in Comparative Judgments

    Jerwen Jou, Maria Sevilla Matos et al.•The American Journal of Psychology•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae