Vicarious Religion and Fiscal Instruments
The Danish Debate on the ELC’s Funding
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7163922 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brian Arly Jacobsen (0000-0001-8449-8202, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 108-124 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nordic Journal of Religion and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0809-7291 • E-ISSN: 1890-7008 |
| Publisher | Scandinavian University Press (PUBLISHER • NO) |
| DOI | 10.18261/njrs.38.2.4 |
| OpenAlex | W7115890603 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
The relationship between the state and religious institutions in Denmark is unique due to the Evangelical-Lutheran Church’s (ELC) integration with state functions. Historically recognized as a state church under Denmark’s 1849 Constitution, the ELC has hitherto been financially supported by the government. In a modern pluralistic society, however, this arrangement raises questions about secularism, national identity, and religious freedom. The debate on Church financing, highlighted by a 2016 parliamentary proposal, aimed to reform how the Church is funded by suggesting that clergy salaries should be covered by church taxes rather than state subsidies. Rather than merely describing parliamentary speeches, the article explains variations in party positions by linking fiscal instrument design, constitutional constraints, and “vicarious religion” logics. It specifies testable implications regarding when parties push for member-funded proclamation versus state-funded heritage and administration
Danish · Mercantilism · Proclamation · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religious Freedom and Discrimination
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |