Dōgen and the Exploration Model of Buddhist Practice
A Non-Teleological Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7164767 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher W Gowans (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 316-334 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy East and West (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8221 • E-ISSN: 1529-1898 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2025.a962876 |
| OpenAlex | W4411068977 |
| Language | EN |
Buddhist practice is commonly understood as a path from suffering to enlightenment. However, in the Chan and Zen traditions, this understanding was disrupted by the ideas of sudden enlightenment and original enlightenment. I contend that in the work of Huineng and especially Dōgen, a different understanding of Buddhist practice emerges, a non-teleological approach that I call the exploration model of Buddhist practice. In this essay, I defend this interpretation and argue that the exploration model is worthy of our attention as a distinctive understanding of Buddhist practice that has philosophical advantages over the path understanding. I begin by discussing developments in East Asia that led to challenges to the path model. I then present the interpretations of Huineng and Dōgen in turn. In the final section, I develop the exploration model and argue for its importance
Buddhism · Epistemology · Teleology · Theology · Chinese history and philosophy · Japanese History and Culture · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|