Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Original sin, control, and divine blame

Some Critical Reflections on the Moderate Doctrine of Original Sin

Bibliographic Data

ID7166305
AuthorsAku Visala (0000-0002-8692-804X, University of Helsinki, corresponding author), Olli-Pekka Vainio (0000-0001-8823-2356, University of Helsinki)
Year2025
Volume61
Issue1
Pages78-92
Publication date2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligious Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034412523001087
OpenAlexW4390540650
LanguageIT
Citations received1
References cited20

This article examines a construal of the doctrine of original sin which affirms the cognitive corruption of human faculties but denies that humans carry original guilt for Adam's fall or for cognitive corruption. All humans require Christ's atonement, because they either inevitably commit at least one sin or are rejected by God for other reasons. We go on to identify three problems with this account. The first problem is the ‘inevitability’ of sinning. Here, the defender is forced either to accept a compatibilist analysis of responsibility or provide a libertarian-friendly analysis of ‘inevitability’. The latter option contradicts the Augustinian contention that it is impossible for sinners to lead a life of virtue and holiness. The second problem has to do with the mechanics of the cognitive effects of sin. The cognitive effects of original sin make it very difficult or inevitable for humans to perform meritorious actions and very easy or inevitable for them to commit sinful actions. If the sinner's degree of control over her sinful actions is so low, it seems that she does not deserve divine blame and punishment for failing to commit meritorious actions. Finally, we raised some problems regarding the fate of the non-culpable sinners

Atonement · Blame · Commit · Compatibilism · Control (management) · Doctrine · Economics · Epistemology · Free will · Language change · Law and economics · Original sin · Punishment (psychology) · Sociology · Theology · Virtue · Augustinian Studies and Theology · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

  • Non-belief as self-deception

    Open Access•Lari Launonen•Religious Studies•2025

  • Atonement

    Eleonore Stump•Atonement•2018

  • Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays

    P F Strawson•Freedom And Resentment And Other…•2008

  • Responsibility and Control

    Open Access•John Martin Fischer, Mark Ravizza•Responsibility and Control•1998

  • Responsibility and Atonement

    Richard Swinburne•Responsibility and atonement•1989

  • The Oxford Handbook of Systematic Theology

    Kathryn Tanner, John Webster et al.•The Oxford Handbook of Systematic…•2007

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae