Inclusive Dialog With Local Communities
Practices Among Professionals and the Battle for Equity and Public Engagement in Science Museums and Science Centers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7167236 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Débora Teixeira Dos Santos E Menezes (0000-0003-2028-2255, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and Université Toulouse III IUT Paul Sabatier, corresponding author), Diego Vaz Bevilaqua (0000-0003-4822-4874, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil), Douglas Falcão Silva (0000-0001-6158-9566, Museu de Astronomia e Ciências Afins (MAST) Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1213-1231 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21957 |
| OpenAlex | W4407382468 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
This study aimed to understand the actions carried out for dialog between science centers and science museums with the public of local communities living in a situation of socioeconomic vulnerability. The study adopted a quantitative and qualitative approach and the theoretical framework of science communication, of the exercise of citizenship and of engagement with science, using concepts such as Technoscientific Citizenship, Social Appropriation of Science and Technology, and Science Capital. Also, a few previous visitor studies on the same purpose of inclusion and social equity were considered. The methodology involved the participation of professionals who work in Brazilian institutions, in two stages of data collection, both carried out online. Initially, a questionnaire was answered by 69 professionals, of whom nine took part in in‐depth interviews. The qualitative data was analyzed using the Discourse of the Collective Subject (DCS) method, from which the results have been presented in three Categories and twelve Synthesis‐Speeches. The establishment of a dialog with a broader public involves taking on a long‐term institutional commitment, developing broad access mechanisms with respect to cultural differences. It is fundamental to make constant and careful efforts to welcome a diverse public and meet the challenge of breaking down prejudices. The implementation of the social role of science centers and science museums not only democratize knowledge but promotes a freedom feeling and the raise of self‐esteem of those who engage in its activities. The results corroborated previous studies, stating that to build a legacy and to foster significant changes in the profile of the audience, the social exclusion needs to be treated as a structural, complex, and multifaceted issue
Archaeology · Battle · Dialog box · Equity (law) · Pedagogy · Political science · Public engagement · Public relations · Science education · Sociology · Animal and Plant Science Education · History · Museums and Cultural Heritage · Science and Science Education
“Not Designed for Us”
Equity in informal science education
Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education
A Systematic Map of Inclusion, Equity and Diversity in Science Communication Research
Equity, Exclusion and Everyday Science Learning
“Science capital”
Public uptake of science
Interested but not being served
End of Millennium
Reimagining publics and (non) participation
Repensando o museu integral
Social Inclusion, the Museum and the Dynamics of Sectoral Change
Hacia la medición del impacto de las prácticas de apropiación social de la ciencia y la tecnología
Questions de sociologie
L'école conservatrice
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |