Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Propositional logic, paradox, and Indian dialectics – towards a deeper ontological approach in paradox theory

Bibliographic Data

ID7169263
AuthorsAlbrecht Fritzsche (0000-0003-4742-7346, International University of Rabat, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume42
Issue3
Pages629-639
Publication date2025-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSystems Research and Behavioral Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1092-7026 • E-ISSN: 1099-1743
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sres.3018
OpenAlexW4397293889
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited75

The article responds to the call of organizational paradox theorists to explore the added value of eastern principles of thought as a basis for a better understanding of the treatment of contradictory opposites in organisations. Drawing on prior work in systems theory, it presents a logical analysis of paradox based on the Catuṣkoṭi or Tetralemma discussed in Madhyamika Buddhism. Unlike its predecessors, the article reads the Tetralemma as an expression of a gradual process of detachment from the subject matter in question, resulting from a change of perspective. On this basis, the article is able to distinguish two different accounts of paradox in organisations, one resulting from excess determinacy and the other resulting from a lack of determinacy. For organisational practice, this means that the perception of and attitude towards values, routines, strategy or identity needs more attention in the study of paradox, which Indian dialectics might facilitate

Dialectic · Epistemology · Indian History and Philosophy · Philosophy

  • Programmed power

    Shuang Liu•Information Technology and People•2026

  • Programmed visibility. Tax reform legitimacy between strategic opacity and platform circulation

    Open Access•Rafael Quintero Godínez, Massimo Terenzi•Information Technology and People•2026

  • Multifunctional Tetralemma. Framework for the Strategic Management of Moral Trade-offs

    Open Access•Steffen Roth, Vladislav Valentinov•Journal of Business Ethics•2026

  • Reimagining ESG

    Open Access•Steffen Roth, Vladislav Valentinov•Organization & Environment•2026

  • Willing unwillingness. A Luhmannian perspective on followership and leadership in organizations

    Open Access•Augusto Sales, Juliana Mansur et al.•Systems Research and Behavioral…•2025

  • Science in action

    Bruno Latour•Science in action•1987

  • Nagarjuna's Madhyamaka

    Jan Westerhoff•Nagarjuna's Madhyamaka•2009

  • The Essence of Chaos

    Edward N Lorenz•The Essence Of Chaos•1993

  • Organizational Identity and Identification

    Stuart Albert, Blake E Ashforth et al.•Academy of Management Review•2000

  • Toward a Theory of Paradox

    Wilson K Smith, Wendy K Smith et al.•Academy of Management Review•2011

  • Dynamic capabilities

    Open Access•Kathleen M Eisenhardt, Jeffrey A Martin•Strategic Management Journal•2000

  • Paradox as a Metatheoretical Perspective

    Open Access•M W Lewis, Wilson K Smith et al.•The Journal of Applied Behavioral…•2014

  • Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking

    Lotte S LÜScher, M W Lewis•Academy of Management Journal•2008

  • Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change

    Myeong‐Gu Seo, Myeong-Gu Seo et al.•Academy of Management Review•2002

  • Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox

    Ella Miron-Spektor, Ella Miron‐Spektor et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2018

  • Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability

    Open Access•Charles A O’reilly, Michael L Tushman•Research in Organizational Behavior•2008

  • Yin Yang

    Open Access•Tula Fang, Tony Fang•Management and Organization Review•2012

  • Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management

    Yan Zhang, David A Waldman et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2015

  • Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations

    Linda L Putnam, Gail T Fairhurst et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2016

  • Social Identity Theory and the Organization

    Blake E Ashforth, Fred A Mael et al.•Academy of Management Review•1989

  • The principles of scientific management

    Open Access•Frederick Winslow Taylor, Frederıck Wınslow Taylor•The principles of scientific…•2024

  • System as Difference

    Open Access•N Luhmann•Organization•2006

  • Outline of a Theory of Practice

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu, Richard Nice•On Violence•2007

  • On Interests and their Transformation

    Open Access•Michel Callon, John Law•Social Studies of Science•1982

  • Logic and dialectics in the Madhyamakak?rik?s

    Open Access•Guy Bugault•Journal of Indian Philosophy•1983

  • The uses of the four positions of theCatuskoti and the problem of the description of reality in Mahāyāna Buddhism

    Open Access•D Seyfort Ruegg•Journal of Indian Philosophy•1977

  • Nāgārjuna’s Catuṣkoṭi

    Open Access•J Westerhoff•Journal of Indian Philosophy•2005

  • The processes of causal attribution

    Harold H Kelley•American Psychologist•1973

  • The Paradoxy of Observing Systems

    N Luhmann•Cultural Critique•1995

  • The Essentials of Buddhist Philosophy

    A K Reischauer, Junjiro Takakusu et al.•Journal of the American Oriental…•1950

Unique citing works5
Citations per year5
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae