Use of Dependency‐Annotated Learner Corpora in Measuring Syntactic Complexity for Granularity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Transparency
Implications for Research and Teaching
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7169348 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yujie Zhang (0000-0001-6480-4268, Faculty of Education and Social Work The University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand), Long Jiang Zhang (0000-0003-1025-1746, Faculty of Education and Social Work The University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1050-1063 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | TESOL Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-8322 • E-ISSN: 1545-7249 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/tesq.3370 |
| OpenAlex | W4404487634 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 32 |
Syntactic complexity has long been used to gauge language learners' performance, proficiency, and development, offering language teachers valid recommendations for syllabus design and materials development. Progress in syntactic complexity research foreshadows the imperative of measuring syntactic features at a high level of granularity, which remains, however, inadequately represented in the current operationalization of syntactic complexity. Beyond this misalignment, researchers also caution against the issues of consistency and accuracy in its measurement. We thus advocate for a methodological synergy by combining automatized dependency annotation and self‐built learner corpora, arguing that this can effectively address the aforementioned concerns and promote the initiative for transparency and openness in applied linguistics. Next, we concisely showcase how to manage this method step by step, which can be done easily with tools, and some practical considerations, so researchers and teachers can compile their do‐it‐yourself corpora. We conclude by discussing the implications of adopting this method for research and teaching. How this method can figure into potential areas of inquiry is identified with examples, including task‐based language teaching, writing assessment, and additional language syntactic acquisition. Pedagogically, we illustrate how this method can help language teachers identify gaps in learners' language production, raise their language awareness, and inform learner‐centered instruction
Consistency (knowledge bases · Dependency (UML · Dependency grammar · Granularity · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Programming language · Transparency (behavior · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification · Topic Modeling
Corpus Linguistics, Learner Corpora, and SLA
Task-Based Learner Production
Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix
Dependency Distance as a Metric of Language Comprehension Difficulty
Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners
Measuring Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing Using Fine‐Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices
Caf
Calling for More Consistency, Refinement, and Critical Consideration in the Use of Syntactic Complexity Measures for Writing
Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA
Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment
Dependency Grammar
Dependency parsing of learner English
Syntactic complexity in assessing young adolescent EFL learners’ writings
Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development
The Linguistic Development of Students of English as a Second Language in Two Written Genres
Open science
Learner Corpora in Corpus‐Informed Instruction
A Corpus‐Based Evaluation of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of College‐Level ESL Writers' Language Development
Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
Introducing Registered Reports at Language Learning
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |